East Texas Review (Longview, TX, 11/03/04) Minuteman Media
A prominent liberal Arab journalist who strongly supported the war
in Iraq, has a long record of outspoken opposition to Islamic extremism,
and has a deep appreciation for American values recently told me
that he has never been more depressed or more alienated from the
United States. Why? He was absolutely clear: George W. Bush’s
policies and rhetoric have made it impossible for moderates such
as himself to win their battles for a more liberal Arab future.
This may seem odd given how often President Bush talks about bringing
democracy to the Arab world. He declares that America’s security
depends on a "forward strategy of freedom" in the Middle
East. If so, he is jeopardizing our safety. For all of the talk
about spreading Arab democracy, it is impossible to name a single
Arab country that is significantly freer than it was four years
ago. Many countries are more authoritarian. Arab dictators know
better than to believe Mr. Bush’s calls for change, and liberals
have learned not to put their faith in them.
George Bush's loss of credibility in the Arab world has deeply undermined
American security and power in the region. Part of the problem is
that, as John Kerry argues, the administration’s "fantasy
world of spin" blinds it to the harsh realities in Iraq. With
Mr. Bush oddly praising Iraq’s progress towards democracy
at a time when entire regions of the country are controlled by insurgents,
American soldiers are killed daily, and his own intelligence briefings
warn of impending catastrophe, the president seems dangerously out
of touch with reality.
The disconnect between words and deeds have led to his loss of credibility.
He oversold the threat posed by Saddam Hussein, responded too slowly
to the revelations of torture at Abu Ghraib, and continues to support
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon even as he renounces Mr. Bush’s
own road map to peace. The administration’s open scorn for
international public opinion only deepens the problem. Recent polls
reveal that 96 percent of Jordanians hold a negative opinion of
George Bush and a stunning 98 percent of Egyptians view the United
States negatively.
It is almost impossible to exaggerate the magnitude of the administration’s
failure on the battlefield of ideas. The president's response to
the recommendations of a congressional panel to fix American public
diplomacy was so tepid that even Frank Wolf, its Republican sponsor,
complained. When the first appointee to a new position of public
diplomacy czar quit, Mr. Bush couldn’t be bothered to fill
the post for nine months — during the Iraq war, when it would
have been useful.
And then there is the administration's absolutely appalling record
on freedom of the press. Our officials repeatedly denounce Arab
television stations for their coverage of Iraq. Certainly, complaining
about the media is a time-honored tradition, especially for politicians
with no other plan. But exerting diplomatic pressure on Qatar, the
country which hosts al-Jazeera, to force that station to change
its coverage reeks of hypocrisy at a time when the president claims
he wants Arab governments to become more democratic. Remaining silent
when interim Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi shut down al-Jazeera's
offices in Iraq sent a clear message to all Arab dictators: We don't
care about freedom of the press, and neither should you.
Instead of working to encourage and engage independent Arab media,
the Bush administration started its own Arabic language stations.
It threw over $100 million at al-Hurra television and Radio Sawa
at a time when the entire budget for direct outreach to the Islamic
world stagnated at $25 million. The result? A television station
which only 16 percent of Saudis watch, which almost no Arabs find
credible, and which has already sunk into obscurity.
For America to triumph in the war on terrorism, it needs to encourage
Arab and Muslim moderates in their own struggles for reform. But
by now, our credibility has sunk to such depths that even attractive
proposals will fail. Moderate Arabs and Muslims, who desperately
want reform and long for positive relations with America, despair
of this administration. In their eyes, our policies have greatly
strengthened the hand of radicals and made the prospects of a democratic
Middle East that much more distant.
Marc Lynch is associate professor of political science at Williams
College, Williamstown, Mass., and is the author of the forthcoming
book, Sympathy for the Devil: Iraq and the New Arab Public
from Columbia University Press.
MERIP
OP-EDS
A Country at a Crossroads The Austin-American Statesman (Austin, Texas) November 9, 2007
Kamran Asdar Ali
"A
very frank discussion"— so President Bush described
his Nov. 7 telephone
conversation with Pervez Musharraf, four days after the Pakistani
general
imposed a state of emergency and dissolved the high court expected
to rule
his continued presidency unconstitutional. And frank the discussion
probably
was: In the face of spirited protest in Pakistan, and a querulous
press in
Washington, back-channel pressure succeeded in persuading Musharraf
to
promise parliamentary elections. Yet the generous U.S. aid earmarked
for
Pakistan — on top of nearly $10 billion since 2001 — is
quite evidently not
at risk.
What may be at risk is Musharraf's tenure as head
of the military government. Full
story>>
The
war debate in Washington is bogged down. Partisan rancor is one
reason why, and bipartisan desire for US hegemony in the oil-rich
Persian Gulf is
another. But many Americans are vexed by a nobler concern: that
a
“precipitous” US departure from Iraq would leave intensified
civil war,
ethnic-sectarian cleansing and massive refugee flows in its wake.
This
concern is legitimate. Unfortunately, the sad fact is that Iraq’s
civil war
and humanitarian emergency have grown steadily worse as the US
military
deployment there wears on. Full
Story>>
Should
the United States, seeking to recalibrate the balance between
security and liberty in the "war on terror," emulate
Israel in its treatment of Palestinian detainees? That is the position
that Guantanamo detainee lawyers Avi Stadler and John Chandler
of Atlanta, and some others, have advocated. That people in U.S.
custody could be held incommunicado for years without charges,
and could be prosecuted or indefinitely detained on the basis of
confessions extracted with torture is worse than a national disgrace.
It is an assault on the foundations of the rule of law. Full
Story>>
There
is an oft-told Palestinian allegory about a family who complained
their house was small and cramped. In response, the father brought
the farm
animals inside -- the goat, the sheep and the chickens all crowded
into the
house. Then, one by one, he moved the animals back outside. By
the time the
last chicken left, the family felt such relief they never complained
of the
lack of elbow room again. Full
Story>>