Since Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice's recent Middle East tour concluded without
concrete results, and unity talks between Fatah and Hamas remain
at a standstill, the possibility of an Israeli-Palestinian political
compromise appears bleaker than ever. But Palestinian lives and
livelihoods should no longer be held hostage to the reigning diplomatic
stagnation.
It has been more than six months since the United States and its
European allies imposed an economic embargo on the democratically
elected Hamas-led government. Recent media reports have detailed
the alarming economic, social and humanitarian consequences of this
blockade for Palestinian society. While international relief organizations
have warned of a humanitarian crisis should external funding not
resume, they neglect to explain the history, context and likely
outcomes of the impending emergency.
It has been six years since Israel tightened its system of checkpoints
and closures on the occupied West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem
at the start of the second intifada. Palestinians' income has deflated
and their meager savings depleted by years of economic suffocation.
Unemployment, poverty and disease are spreading, and signals of
incipient social breakdown abound. This is the kindling of conflagrations
to come.
The financial siege on the Palestinian Authority is particularly
devastating because Palestinians have been forced by the Israeli
occupation into almost complete dependence on foreign aid for growth,
development and survival. Neither the state economy nor family budgets
can become self-sustaining when an external power wields near-absolute
control over the movement of people and goods.
While the Israeli government claims security concerns to justify
prohibitions on Palestinian movement, human rights groups like B'Tselem
have found that the closure of the Rafah crossing between Gaza and
Egypt, for example, serves as a blatant means of collective punishment.
There are numerous documented cases recounting Israeli soldiers'
abuse of Palestinians at checkpoints. During the recent war between
Israel and Hezbollah, many Palestinians reported being forced to
denounce the Hezbollah leader, Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah, before they
were allowed to pass. Such behavior has little to do with Israeli
state security, and everything to do with the bullying and intimidation
from an occupying power.
Now that teachers, school administrators and other civil servants
are striking to protest the embargo on their Palestinian Authority-paid
salaries, students' educations are likewise impeded. UNICEF reports
that the majority of the 1,726 Palestinian public schools are either
partially or completely closed. Meanwhile, increasing poverty and
persistent checkpoints are dissolving the social ties that sustain
people. The World Bank predicts that in 2006 Palestinian GDP will
suffer a 27 percent decline. Families can no longer afford the cost
of transportation to visit one another, and petty crime is on the
rise.
According to the sanctions' logic, Palestinians will be starved
into demanding that their government fulfill the conditions imposed
by the international community. The ill-concealed goal of such tactics
is to cause Hamas to lose favor with constituents for whom they
are unable to provide. However, many in the Hamas government were
imprisoned before they could try their hand at governing. As such,
many Palestinians have looked past ideological differences to stand
by the party, believing that their democratically elected representatives
should have a chance to succeed or fail according to their own merits
or missteps.
These years of economic suffocation will undoubtedly produce an
even more resentful population. In a few years, those who are youth
now, when food is scarce and education impossible, will grow into
leaders. The lesson they will have learned is that suffering for
the sake of democracy brings only punishment.
If funding and the ability to move and work are not restored now,
it will not be long until the world finds out what alternative system
the young people raised in these desperate circumstances might develop.
Lifting the siege on the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian society
is the necessary first step-but only the first-toward removing the
Israeli occupation that is the root of Palestinians' economic woes
and the source of insecurity for themselves, the Israelis and the
international community.
---
Lori Allen, an anthropologist at Harvard's Weatherhead Center for
International Affairs, is an editor of "Middle East Report,"
a publication of the Middle East Research and Information Project
in Washington, D.C. www.merip.org. Column distributed by MinutemanMedia.org.
MERIP
OP-EDS
A Country at a Crossroads The Austin-American Statesman (Austin, Texas) November 9, 2007
Kamran Asdar Ali
"A
very frank discussion"— so President Bush described
his Nov. 7 telephone
conversation with Pervez Musharraf, four days after the Pakistani
general
imposed a state of emergency and dissolved the high court expected
to rule
his continued presidency unconstitutional. And frank the discussion
probably
was: In the face of spirited protest in Pakistan, and a querulous
press in
Washington, back-channel pressure succeeded in persuading Musharraf
to
promise parliamentary elections. Yet the generous U.S. aid earmarked
for
Pakistan — on top of nearly $10 billion since 2001 — is
quite evidently not
at risk.
What may be at risk is Musharraf's tenure as head
of the military government. Full
story>>
The
war debate in Washington is bogged down. Partisan rancor is one
reason why, and bipartisan desire for US hegemony in the oil-rich
Persian Gulf is
another. But many Americans are vexed by a nobler concern: that
a
“precipitous” US departure from Iraq would leave intensified
civil war,
ethnic-sectarian cleansing and massive refugee flows in its wake.
This
concern is legitimate. Unfortunately, the sad fact is that Iraq’s
civil war
and humanitarian emergency have grown steadily worse as the US
military
deployment there wears on. Full
Story>>
Should
the United States, seeking to recalibrate the balance between
security and liberty in the "war on terror," emulate
Israel in its treatment of Palestinian detainees? That is the position
that Guantanamo detainee lawyers Avi Stadler and John Chandler
of Atlanta, and some others, have advocated. That people in U.S.
custody could be held incommunicado for years without charges,
and could be prosecuted or indefinitely detained on the basis of
confessions extracted with torture is worse than a national disgrace.
It is an assault on the foundations of the rule of law. Full
Story>>
There
is an oft-told Palestinian allegory about a family who complained
their house was small and cramped. In response, the father brought
the farm
animals inside -- the goat, the sheep and the chickens all crowded
into the
house. Then, one by one, he moved the animals back outside. By
the time the
last chicken left, the family felt such relief they never complained
of the
lack of elbow room again. Full
Story>>