Topeka Capital-Journal (06/03/05) Minuteman Media Northwest Arkansas Times (06/05/05)
"America will stand with the allies of freedom to support democratic
movements in the Middle East and beyond, with the ultimate goal
of ending tyranny in our world." With these soaring words in the
2005 State of the Union Address, President George W. Bush swore
to overturn the long-standing US policy of backing friendly dictators
in countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
At the May 20-22 World Economic Forum in Jordan, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State Elizabeth Cheney reiterated this "transformational
vision" to the assembled Arab political and business leaders. For
60 years, said the vice president's daughter, Washington had mistakenly
backed the Arab status quo in exchange for stabilitybut no
longer.
Now the Bush administration's big talk about democracy in the Arab
world has metand flunkeda major test.
In Egypt, the most populous Arab country and a long-time US ally,
a vibrant and creative democratic movement called Kifaya, or Enough,
burst onto the scene in December 2004. The Kifaya activists, who
span the political spectrum from Islamists to liberals to socialists,
took to the streets to demand that President Husni Mubarak step
down. On four occasions, the regime has presented Egyptians with
a yes-or-no referendum on continuation of Mubarak's presidencybut
never allowed anyone else to run. In January, Mubarak seemed poised
to pull the same trick to extend his 24-year rule.
But throughout the winter and spring, the forces of dissent gathered
momentum. On February 26, Mubarak appeared to relent, pledging to
adjust the Egyptian constitution to provide for a multi-candidate
presidential election rather than simply another rubber-stamping.
But when it came time to approve the amendment, the Egyptian parliament,
which is dominated by Mubarak's ruling party, came up with a set
of rules that all but lock in the status quo. Only parties recognized
by the government can field a candidate, meaning that the powerful
but outlawed Muslim Brotherhood cannot compete, and independent
hopefuls are required to collect 300 signatures from members of
local councils also controlled by regime loyalists.
One would expect the Bush administration to pounce on this transparent
rigging of the system. The Kifaya movement certainly did. On the
day of the parliamentary vote, Kifaya demonstrators labeled the
measure "theatrics" and the movement's leaders published a statement
accusing the ruling party of "aborting people's hopes for freedom
and democracy." A week beforehand, Bush had seemed to agree, saying
that the Egyptian election should proceed "with rules that allow
for a real campaign."
But now the US has backtracked. When the Egyptian prime minister
came to Washington, Bush did not publicly dress him down. First
Lady Laura Bush even called the democracy-limiting measure "a very
wise and bold step" as she visited the Pyramids during her recent
Middle East tour. "You know that each step is a small step, that
you can't be quick."
Some say the Bush administration's Palestine and Iraq policies have
so soured Arab public opinion on the US that Washington would harm
the prospects of Arab pro-democracy movements by supporting them
openly. That may be true. But the Bush administration did something
else entirely with its rhetorical reversal regarding Egyptit
came out in favor of the authoritarian regime as it works to fend
off popular demands for change. Not surprisingly, the regime seized
the opportunity to squeeze its opponents. On May 25, during a popular
referendum on the constitutional amendment, several Egyptian and
Western journalists witnessed regime-bought goons beat and molest
Kifaya protestersand even rip the clothes off at least two
female activists. Police stood idly by.
What was the "transformational" Bush administration's response to
this brazen crackdown? Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice demurred:
"Not everything moves at the same speed, and there are going to
be different speeds in the Middle East."
Many Arabs regard Egypt as the bellwether indicating the prevailing
political winds. By turning its back as the Egyptian regime squelches
a democracy movement, the Bush administration is giving de facto
license to other regimes to follow suit. When it comes to US allies,
it would seem, Bush's big talk about democracy is nothing but talk.
--
Chris Toensing is editor of Middle East Report, published
by the Middle East Research and Information Project in Washington,
DC.
MERIP
OP-EDS
A Country at a Crossroads The Austin-American Statesman (Austin, Texas) November 9, 2007
Kamran Asdar Ali
"A
very frank discussion"— so President Bush described
his Nov. 7 telephone
conversation with Pervez Musharraf, four days after the Pakistani
general
imposed a state of emergency and dissolved the high court expected
to rule
his continued presidency unconstitutional. And frank the discussion
probably
was: In the face of spirited protest in Pakistan, and a querulous
press in
Washington, back-channel pressure succeeded in persuading Musharraf
to
promise parliamentary elections. Yet the generous U.S. aid earmarked
for
Pakistan — on top of nearly $10 billion since 2001 — is
quite evidently not
at risk.
What may be at risk is Musharraf's tenure as head
of the military government. Full
story>>
The
war debate in Washington is bogged down. Partisan rancor is one
reason why, and bipartisan desire for US hegemony in the oil-rich
Persian Gulf is
another. But many Americans are vexed by a nobler concern: that
a
“precipitous” US departure from Iraq would leave intensified
civil war,
ethnic-sectarian cleansing and massive refugee flows in its wake.
This
concern is legitimate. Unfortunately, the sad fact is that Iraq’s
civil war
and humanitarian emergency have grown steadily worse as the US
military
deployment there wears on. Full
Story>>
Should
the United States, seeking to recalibrate the balance between
security and liberty in the "war on terror," emulate
Israel in its treatment of Palestinian detainees? That is the position
that Guantanamo detainee lawyers Avi Stadler and John Chandler
of Atlanta, and some others, have advocated. That people in U.S.
custody could be held incommunicado for years without charges,
and could be prosecuted or indefinitely detained on the basis of
confessions extracted with torture is worse than a national disgrace.
It is an assault on the foundations of the rule of law. Full
Story>>
There
is an oft-told Palestinian allegory about a family who complained
their house was small and cramped. In response, the father brought
the farm
animals inside -- the goat, the sheep and the chickens all crowded
into the
house. Then, one by one, he moved the animals back outside. By
the time the
last chicken left, the family felt such relief they never complained
of the
lack of elbow room again. Full
Story>>