At
the 103rd annual Wallow of the semi-secretive Military Order
of the Carabao -- founded by veterans of the American occupation
of the Philippines -- 1,200 barrel-chested, bemedaled Carabaos
and guests were in for a treat as they settled their tuxedoed
and kilted rumps into their seats for a post-prandial soiree
of songs and spoofs. In addition to much raucous celebration
of George W. Bush's upcoming war, the Wallow's entertainers
offered them a hilarious skewering of the press. The revelers'
mood was nothing short of rambunctiously drunken as the
theatrical production wore on, but the high point came with
a campy rendition of "The Man of La Mancha," set
in a mythical yet strangely familiar land called Pentagonia.
Rummy
Quixote, a talented baritone, bellowed bravely about his
travails tilting at penny-pinching Congressional windmills,
while his sidekick Sancho Wolfowitz rendered unto Pentagonia's
Caesar a lilting ode of undying loyalty. A portly white
guy in pigtails daintily played Princess Condoleia -- modeled
on the literary Quixote's love Dulcinea -- for whose affections,
it was said, Sir Colin and Rummy Quixote regularly joust.
But the prancing court jesters elicited the most deafening
uproar from the assembled menagerie of highly placed politicos,
defense contractors and septuagenarian seamen.
"In
Pentagonia, the court jesters are the press corps, but you
probably knew that already," the narrator deadpanned.
"The
jesters sit in daily anticipation of what Rummy Quixote
may tell them in briefings at the Pentagonia press room
about his quests through daunting and distant landsÉand
though Rummy tells them very little, the press corps jesters
stand in awe of him." Deep into the throes of Bush's
permanent wartime presidency, even the military sees fit
to poke fun at our nation's scribblers for being too soft
on the Department of Defense. Indeed, bygone are the days
of those Vietnam-era critics.
Soon
enough, the jesters got the chance to tell their side of
the story. Swaying from side to side, heads tilted and eyelashes
batting, they regaled the Wallowers with their "Paean
to Rummy":
We
like him. We really like him.
Though
he wont say what we want to hear,
We
really like him.
Though
he can make us feel real lowly,
We
like his smile, angelic style, he's holy.
We
really like him.
Though
he puts us in our place, when he's cutting to the chase,
We don't do anything. We just suffer our pain because We
like him.
When
we ask him something tough,
His
response can sound real rough.
Then
we sit there in awe, as he lays down the law.
It's
a big mystery, but its clear as can be
That
we like him.
Other
songs on the docket also got a rise from the crowd. A soaring
"Aria for Martha" (Stewart) pointed out that after
the many corporate scandals of 2002, "Congress finally
realized that our $600 toilet seats are small potatoes."
The "Harvey Pitt Stomp," belted out to the tune
of the pop hit "Taking Care of Business," lampooned
the former SEC chairman for handling Wall Street robber
barons with kid gloves. As the rousing coda of "Saddam's
Campaign Song" faded into the cigar-choked evening
air, the narrator marveled at the Iraqi leader's 100 percent
voter approval rating in the last plebiscite. No one, he
added, previously realized that Saddam had grown up in Chicago.
"Preemption" -- a timely peroration toward the
end of the performance -- was sung with particular gusto.
This musical statement, the emcee intoned, is our "commander-in-chief's
infallible answer to whatever lies ahead: hit the other
guy before he hits us." The Carabaos and their friends
responded with loud "hoo-ahhhs" of approval. "So
that's how it will be, that's how the cookie cuts,"
the lyrics concluded in a preview of the Bush-Powell presentation
to the Security Council. "We hope to hell our allies
will get up off their butts."
Throughout
the onstage proceedings, another officer of the Order interrupted
with reports from locales scattered throughout the Carabao
corral. The Bombinero's job is to ensure that the Herd stays
adequately "wetted down" at all times, meaning
that every table's stock of booze is regularly replenished.
As Historiador Rear Admiral Ralph Ghormley explains in his
official chronicle of the Carabaos, "The carabao is
a docile beast of pacific demeanor -- as long as it stays
wet. But deprive that animal of its right to unlimited moisture,
deprive it of time to wallow in the muddy shallows -- in
short keep it dry and thirsty -- and it becomes a very different,
a very formidable and indeed distinctly dangerous beast."
Perhaps
because their cup runneth over, few Carabaos seemed nervous
about the possible dangers of Bush's Mesopotamian adventure.
"For us, WMD are not so daunting," one speaker
announced. "For us WMD only means: whiskey, make mine
a double."
Carabao
Wallows are never short on star power. This year, Casper
Weinberger, defense secretary under the soon-to-be-sainted
Ronald Reagan, showed up to deliver a brief and barely audible
thank-you for his Distinguished Service Award. Former Virginia
Senator Chuck Robb, a Carabao, hunkered down for his repast
near the front, as did Missouri Congressman Ike Skelton.
Also
on the seating chart was retired General Barry McCaffrey,
who commanded a division in the Persian Gulf War which was
famous for its bloody tank drive across the "highway
of death" in 1991 Iraq. General McCaffrey has hardly
rested on the laurels won during Desert Storm, serving as
"drug czar" under the unlamented President Clinton
and, since last year, handicapping Desert Storm II for the
media. When the Washington Post asked McCaffrey whether
the space shuttle disaster would slow down the White House's
war plans, the general replied with Rummyesque directness:
"My instinct is that it will break the intense media
focus, repeating the same endless cycle of two or three
questions which were not really answerable: Why now? Why
[North] Korea? Are there really WMD [weapons of mass destruction]
smoking guns?"
If
the Wallow is any indication, McCaffrey is correct that
the press will take its cue to look elsewhere while military
planners retain a single-minded focus on Iraq. No Carabao
acknowledged the empty chair at the head table, scheduled
to be filled by NASA Director Sean O'Keefe. Unless it occurred
during your correspondent's bathroom break, throughout four
hours of food and fun there was nary a speech nor a moment
of silence for the seven astronauts, on the very night of
the Columbia tragedy. Even the military chaplain who uttered
the closing prayer declined to strike a somber chord. As
he instead exhorted the Herd to "stir up and sustain
the hearts of all citizens in defense of our liberties,"
the chaplain brought the room boisterously alive once more.
Indeed,
everyone seemed to have a grand time at the Wallow, including
the journalists in attendance. After the show, the bar was
packed. One writer from a major news service invited your
correspondent to an "informal after-party" hosted
by Northrup-Grumman for the Carabao Players and their friends.
"There'll be free liquor. Really, you should come,
it promises to be a lot of fun," he coaxed. Clearly,
not only card-holding Carabaos like to be wetted down.
The
last time the gala drew fire in print occurred in 1913,
when President Woodrow Wilson lambasted the boys for their
unseemly behavior. The Herd has never forgotten the criticism.
Several attendees boasted that no president since William
Howard Taft had darkened a Wallow door, "and we're
the happier for it." But the Carabaos despised the
Wilson administration for reasons besides the genteel Wilson's
public rebuke. It is not clear which made them angrier:
Wilson's having granted the Philippines independence or
his administration's order (which stands to this day) to
ban all "non-medicinal" alcohol from Navy ships.
But
that was a long time ago. At the dawn of the twentieth century,
the term "anti-imperialist" was not an ideological
buzzword at the fringes of accepted speech, but a label
unapologetically adopted by mainstream journalists like
Mark Twain and William Jennings Bryan, Wilson's Secretary
of State.
It
was all among good friends. But there was one brief moment
when the frolicsome spirit of press-military relations seemed
like it might turn a tad bit rough. Heads craned as the
evening's military Chaplain stepped to the mike to file
his candid opinion on the topic. "The media blames
the military for just about everything," adding firmly,
"and I, for one, am quite fed up with it." But
after a pregnant pause, it turned out, that the good Chaplain
spoke only in mock anger in order to set up his succeeding
joke. "They even say that the military is not environmentally
friendly, and that we do not recycle enough. Well, what
about Cheney and Rumsfeld? We've recycled them plenty."
Back
in 1978, it was a Washington Post columnist assigned to
cover the Wallow who seems to have best summed up the collegial
spirit. "You either understand these occasions or you
don't, and it's no great matter," he wrote. "I
was never anybody's hero and didn't even drink the free
booze, except for a toast, so I know you don't have to be
bombed past your skull to have a fine time and feel marvelously
at home."
Bob
Woodward’s four books chronicling the wars of President
George W. Bush are sensitive barometers of conventional wisdom in Washington.
Whereas the first volume, published in 2002 at the height of the self-righteous
nationalism gripping the capital after the September 11, 2001 attacks,
hailed Bush’s self-confidence in acting to protect the homeland,
the 2008 installment depicts the same man as cocksure and incurious.
This much is not news. More educational are Woodward’s hints
about the worldviews that will outlast this unpopular administration,
embedded in the organs of the national security state. Full
Story>>
The Egyptian
regime has once again succeeded in stifling freedom of speech, this
time not in Egypt, but in the US. Earlier this month, an Egyptian court
convicted a prominent Egyptian-American activist for his outspoken
criticism of the regime’s poor human
rights record in American public fora. The court accused Saad Eddin
Ibrahim, of "tarnishing Egypt's image" abroad. The conviction
referred primarily to writings he published in the foreign press; most
notably among them an August 2007 op-ed in the Washington Post in which
he criticized Egypt's human rights record and questioned the reasons
behind US aid to Egypt. Full
Story>>
Militant
Islam is under global scrutiny for clues to conditions that foster
its rise, and to strategies for reversing that growth. But the key
is not in Islamic doctrine, US foreign policy or formal ties to various
nations, as many analysts have asserted. It lies at the community
level, with clan and local leaders. Full
Story>>
Kurdish
parties have become kingmakers in Baghdad , and they know it. As
no federal government can work without them, they are pulling every
available political lever to expand the territory and resources they
control, trying to build the foundation of an independent Kurdish state.
But even more than territory, they need security. If everyone acts
quickly and wisely, that understanding could help resolve one of the
Iraq war’s thorniest issues. Full
Story>>
The
debate over the war in Iraq follows a yellowing script: The minute
someone suggests that the US move to withdraw its troops, war supporters
cry “Havoc!”
True to form, when no less a figure than Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki stated he wants a timeline for a US pullout, John McCain
summoned the specter of dire consequences. “I’ve always
said we’ll come home with honor and with victory and not through
a set timetable,” McCain said. In his major foreign policy speech
on July 15, Barack Obama affirmed his support for a withdrawal timetable,
adding that the US must “get out as carefully as we were careless
getting in.” Obama’s position is the correct one, but he,
like many other war critics, has done too little to counter the refrain
that withdrawal is simply
“cutting and running,” a recipe for disaster. Full
Story>>
At
the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) earlier this month, presidential candidates
John McCain and Barack Obama competed over who would become the “candidate
for Israel.” The match came to a draw when both candidates
pledged undying and unconditional support for Israel. While their
support for “Israel right or wrong” was unquestionable,
at the end of all the commotion, the most pertinent question for
Americans and the world remained unasked and unanswered: Who is
the candidate for peace? Full
Story>>