|
Cracks in
Egypt's Electoral Engineering
The 2000 Vote
Vickie Langohr
(Vickie Langohr
teaches political science at the College of the Holy Cross, Worcester,
Mass.)
November 7,
2000
|
Further
Info
The winter
1998 issue of Middle East Report, "Behind the Ballot
Box" (MER 209), examines the contradictions of electoral
politics in authoritarian countries. Marsha Pripstein Posusney's
thematic introduction is available online.
|
November 8
marks the beginning of the third and final round of elections to
the lower house of parliament in Egypt, the largest Arab country
and the second-largest recipient of US foreign aid. With 282 of
the 444 races now complete, results so far have included a strikingly
poor showing by President Husni Mubarak's scandal-plagued National
Democratic Party (NDP), coupled with an unexpectedly strong performance
by the officially outlawed Muslim Brotherhood. In the first round,
the NDP won only 59 seats out of 150; in the second, 42 of 134.
The dimensions of the debacle become clearer when the results in
particular districts are examined -- the party lost all four of
its seats in Suez, won only one of 18 seats in the Delta town of
Kafr al-Sheikh, and gained only one seat out of six in the southern
town of Aswan. The 2000 elections -- the first ever to be supervised
by Egypt's independent judiciary -- have been free to date of the
large-scale ballot-tampering which characterized earlier polls.
That procedural reform, coupled with economic woes, corruption scandals
and a revival of Egyptian street politics, predestined the NDP to
losing seats. But so far, Mubarak's party has found other ways of
ensuring that the NDP will maintain its dominant position in parliament.
JUDICIAL
SUPERVISION
The last several
legislative elections have seen the NDP's share of the parliament's
seats steadily increase, from 68 percent in 1987 to 86 percent in
1990 to an incredible 94 percent in 1995. In the 1995 elections
-- widely viewed as Egypt's most violent and fraudulent ever --
only 14 of 444 seats went to opposition parties. But the NDP had
plenty to be nervous about as this month's elections neared. In
July, the Supreme Constitutional Court, which had dissolved assemblies
in 1985 and 1987 for discriminating against independent candidates,
ruled the 1990 and 1995 election procedures unconstitutional as
well. The constitution calls for judges to supervise balloting in
all locations; in 1990 and 1995, civil servants had overseen voting
at the small rural polling places where most electoral fraud had
occurred. Meeting an old demand of the opposition parties, the Court
decided that elections would be carried out in three stages to ensure
that judges could observe voting everywhere.
THE NDP'S
NIGHTMARE SUMMER
After two years
of pretending to the public that Egypt was awash in hard currency,
this summer Mubarak's government was forced to admit to a severe
liquidity crisis. Late in the summer, the Central Bank devalued
the Egyptian pound from roughly 3.4 to 3.65 pounds to the dollar,
squeezing the purchasing power of most Egyptian consumers. The Economic
Affairs Minister assured TV viewers that this "rise in the
value of the dollar against the Egyptian pound" would not affect
"limited-income families," citing government price subsidies
for staples like bread, sugar and cooking oil. But prices for most
other goods have risen, while incomes have not.
To make matters
worse for the NDP, several parliamentary deputies were convicted
in high-profile corruption cases this year. One deputy was found
selling permits for the pilgrimage to Mecca which he received as
a perquisite of his job. Four other NDP MPs and 28 others were jailed
for exploiting their connections with the leadership of the Nile
Bank to receive inadequately secured loans of up to $1.5 billion.
As many middle-class Egyptians struggle to earn $3000 a year, another
NDP MP was jailed for bouncing checks worth over $600,000. The connection
between the liquidity crisis and the careless NDP stewardship of
the economy, as symbolized by the Nile Bank debacle, was easy for
citizens to draw.
Despite the
government's best efforts, the first two rounds of the election
took place in a highly energized political atmosphere. While the
government's already strict control of mass gatherings usually tightens
in electoral periods, the outbreak of the al-Aqsa intifada in Palestine
brought large numbers of Egyptians across the country into the streets.
The protests -- including a nearly successful march from Cairo University
to the Israeli Embassy on October 4 and an October 16 demonstration
at Cairo University in which a cellular telephone call to Sheikh
Ahmed Yassin of Hamas was broadcast to the crowd -- put the NDP,
which supports Mubarak's cautious diplomatic and commercial ties
with Israel, in a difficult position. Especially after Mubarak heeded
US pressure to host the Sharm al-Sheikh summit, a large vote for
candidates rejecting any ties with Israel became more likely.
RETURN OF
THE MUSLIM BROTHERS
Despite being
technically illegal, the Muslim Brotherhood has run candidates in
the last four elections as independents. For the first time this
year, the Brotherhood ran a female candidate, Jihan al-Halafawi.
The group has already won 15 seats, and expects more in the final
round -- an astonishing result considering the government's concerted
attempts over more than a year to destroy the Brotherhood's electoral
chances. Late last year, 16 Brothers, including leading figures
in the Brotherhood's takeover of several professional syndicates,
were arrested and put on military trial on charges of reviving the
outlawed movement and trying to establish control over the syndicates.
The government has tried to stem the Brotherhood tide through tactics
both familiar -- arresting Brotherhood spokesman Mamoun al-Hudaybi's
campaign organizers and poll representatives a week before he entered
elections in Cairo -- and truly bizarre. When 18 Brothers whom she
had appointed to represent her in polling stations were arrested
on the eve of the first round, female candidate Halafawi filed a
lawsuit demanding postponement of the poll in her district. The
government ignored the court ruling postponing the election, but
when Halafawi and her Brotherhood counterpart in the district received
the highest number of votes going into the runoff election, the
Interior Ministry used the original court decision as the pretext
for delaying the runoff.
At least some
Brotherhood votes are classical "protest" votes against
the NDP's corruption and economic mismanagement, but other opposition
parties have not been able to exploit the ruling party's weaknesses
nearly as effectively. The Wafd, Egypt's oldest party, has suffered
a severe beating, winning only four seats to date despite sponsoring
a list of 273 official candidates, its largest ever. Once a stalwart
defender of economic and political liberalism, the party's 1984
alliance with the Brotherhood drove many Coptic party veterans away.
More recently, the Wafd's liberal credentials were further tarnished
when it opposed reprinting the controversial novel "A Banquet
for Seaweed" on the grounds that it insulted Islam, and opposed
the revised personal status law passed by the government earlier
this year. Many feminists cautiously welcomed the law, which affords
women more rights in divorce matters. Having abdicated the mantle
of political liberalism, the Wafd is left with staunch support of
economic liberalization. But the NDP's consistent support of such
policies gives the Wafd no distinct message to offer.
The other bulwark
of the secular opposition, the National Progressive Unionist Party
(NPUP), has also obtained four seats to date. Given that the party
won a mere five seats in 1990, when it was the only major opposition
party contesting the elections, NPUP's results so far are not surprising,
and with 15 party members contesting seats in the third round they
are almost certain to improve. The party has moved noticeably to
the center in recent years, dropping the word "socialist"
from the party title in 1995 and voting to abstain from rather than
oppose Mubarak's reelection referendum in 1999. The NPUP lacks a
strong popular base, partly because government controls on labor
organizing and unions restrict the party's outreach to its natural
constituency -- Egyptian workers.
"INDEPENDENTS"
AND MONITORS
While the results
of the first two rounds have been embarrassing for the NDP, they
will not affect its overwhelming majority power in the new parliament
due to the large numbers of candidates running as independents who
rejoined the NDP after winning their seats. An unprecedented 79
percent of all candidates ran as independents this year. Most of
the "independents" are actually NDP members who did not
win their party's nomination, and in fact the number of these "independents"
who have rejoined the NDP upon their election has more than doubled
the NDP's numbers, bringing it to 224 of 282 seats -- a very comfortable
majority. The large number of independents is due not only to the
lack of discipline within the NDP but also to the many restrictions
which the state places on the formation of political parties. Any
group wishing to form a party must win the approval of the Political
Parties Committee, which has licensed only one party in the last
twenty years. All of the other 11 parties licensed in this period
won their licenses through court appeals.
So far, the
full judicial supervision of the 2000 balloting appears to have
forestalled the direct fraud that marred past elections in Egypt.
Vigilant election monitoring by NGOs was key to proving the fraud
in the 1995 election, but government attacks over the last two years
on key monitors all but crippled such efforts for this poll. One
monitor, Saad Eddin Ibrahim, was arrested on June 30 on charges
ranging from the purposeful dissemination of information damaging
to Egypt's image to forgery of ballots, and withdrew from monitoring
in early October to prepare for trial. The Egyptian Organization
of Human Rights (EOHR), which carried out the bulk of the field
monitoring in 1995, is suffering financially. Authorities arrested
the group's secretary-general in 1998 for having accepted foreign
funding without notifying the government. Fearing imprisonment,
the group's leaders will not accept any further foreign funding,
virtually guaranteeing the organization's near bankruptcy. Despite
NDP setbacks in the 2000 elections, the government's silencing of
Ibrahim and the EOHR, its campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood
and continued restrictions on the formation of political parties
demonstrate that Egypt is still a long way from truly free and fair
elections.

|