|
A
Truth Commission for Morocco
Susan
Slyomovics
(Susan
Slyomovics, a contributing editor of Middle East Report,
teaches anthropology at MIT.)
The
Moroccan Indemnity Commission set up to compensate victims of "disappearance"
and arbitrary detention during King Hassan II's reign began at the
end -- with indemnities -- of any genuine truth and reconciliation
process. There are no public hearings, no attempts to provide the
nation with an account of the past and blanket amnesties have exempted
notorious torturers from prosecution. Former political prisoners
and human rights activists have responded with their own Forum for
Truth and Equity.
| 
May
4, 2000 candlelight vigil and sit-in in front of Derb Moulay
Cherif, the principal torture center located in Casablanca.
At center-left is Hasan Elhasni Alaoui (former political prisoner,
Group 71 of Islamists), with his wife, Khadija Warab, a lawyer.
(Courtesy of Elhasni Alaoui family.) |
The
grim names Moroccans assign to the post-independence years -- in
Arabic, zaman al-rusas and al-sanawat al-sawda, in
French les anne�s de plomb and les ann�es noires or
in English "the years of lead" and "the black years"
-- evoke an era of grayness and lead bullets, fear and repression.
During les ann�es sombres, the "somber years" of
forcible disappearances and farcical mass political trials, large
numbers of people representing various political persuasions served
long prison sentences for voicing opposition to the regime. By international
standards, they were prisoners of conscience.
What is a political
prisoner? Abderrahman Benameur, lawyer and activist with the Moroccan
Association of Human Rights (AMDH), links political imprisonment
with unauthorized views, but also views emerging from any political
act at all. The Moroccan state, in effect, has criminalized all
political activity and thought that promotes "l'opinion
nonofficielle," political acts such as writing tracts,
holding meetings and attending demonstrations.(1)
A series of
changes in the law during the 1990s serve as a thumbnail history
of the treatment of political prisoners in Morocco. In a much-quoted
speech delivered July 8, 1994, King Hassan II promised "to
turn the page definitively" and to resolve the pressing issue
of political prisoners.(2) Four years earlier, the king had created
a royal Advisory Council on Human Rights, Conseil Consultatif des
Droits de l'Homme (CCDH), with various working subgroups. In 1993,
a new Ministry of Human Rights was formed, and on June 21 of that
year Morocco ratified the United Nations Convention against Torture.
1996 saw revisions in the Code of Penal Procedure which limited
garde-�-vue -- defined as incommunicado detention in Anglo-American
law because Morocco has no habeas corpus -- to 48 hours, with one
24-hour extension allowed at the prosecutor's discretion. Nonetheless,
in state security cases, the rubric under which political prisoners
were tried, the garde-�-vue period remained 96 hours with
possible extensions by the prosecutor. Finally, in 1998, the Ministry
of Justice and the prison administration implemented a law that
made autopsies routine for any death occurring in detention.
Indemnities
on Deadline
More government
activity concerning human rights reforms in 1998 seemed to complement
Morocco's newly elected 1997 government of alternance (rotation
of prime ministers). On October 9, 1998, a speech by King Hassan
II directed again that all human rights cases should be resolved
within six months. In CCDH meetings to discuss the "disappeared"
file on September 28, 1998 and again on October 15, 1998, CCDH and
its president, Driss Dahak, issued a press release establishing
a list of 112 "disappeared" persons. Fifty-six people
were declared dead with no accompanying information; the others
were described as disappeared in unknown situations, either living
abroad or in Morocco, or presumed dead. While these figures were
absurdly low, the CCDH memorandum implicitly confirmed official
state recognition of the fact of forcible disappearance.
Eight days
after the death of King Hassan II on July 23, 1999, his son and
heir Mohammed VI affirmed in his first throne speech a commitment
to establish the rule of law, and to safeguard human rights, individual
and collective liberties, a constitutional monarchy, a multi-party
system, economic liberalism and policies of regionalism and decentralization.(3)
In August, Mohammed VI ordered the CCDH to activate an independent
Indemnity Commission (Commission d'arbitrage), with a mandate to
expire midnight December 31, 1999, to indemnify former victims of
forcible disappearance and arbitrary detention.(4) Detention victims
and Moroccan human rights activists, two communities with overlapping
memberships, roundly criticized the CCDH bulletin describing the
procedures, mandate and membership of the Indemnity Commision. The
CCDH predetermined the number of "disappeared," failing
to count, for example, the Group Bnouhachem (students held in a
variety of secret detention centers without trial from 1975-1984)
and soldiers from the 1971 and 1972 failed coups d'etat held arbitrarily
for almost 20 years in Tazmamart, Morocco's most infamous secret
prison. CCDH members ruled that victims filing requests for indemnities
had no right to appeal decisions. Most outrageously, CCDH granted
amnesty to torturers and to all those responsible for secret detention
centers, illegal garde-�-vue, unfair trials and the systematic
practice of torture in police stations and prisons.
The first six
months of the new king's reign were filled with dramatic events
indicating that Morocco had in fact turned the page on its past
history of human rights abuses. Leftist Abraham Serfaty, one of
the longest incarcerated political prisoners (18 years in jail followed
by seven years of enforced exile in France), came back to Morocco
on September 30, 1999. On November 27, the family of assassinated
leftist leader Mehdi Ben Barka returned. Moroccan newspapers gave
wide coverage to the year-long events following the arrest of General
Augusto Pinochet, Chilean military junta leader from 1973-1990,
and his possible extradition to Spain for the crimes of genocide,
torture and forcible diappearances. Following the Pinochet precedent,
Mohammed El Battiui, a student activist arrested and tortured in
the 1984 Oujda University riots, filed a case against former Interior
Minister Driss Basri. Symbol of the old regime's human rights abuses,
Basri was removed by the new king on November 9, 1999 from a position
he had held since 1979. Now stripped of his immunity, Basri was
accused by El Battiui of "crimes against humanity" on
November 16 at the Palais de Justice in Brussels.(5) By the December
31 deadline set by the CCDH for filing claims against the state,
the Indemnity Commission had received 5,819 dossiers demanding damages.
Beginning
at the End
Chile, Argentina
and South Africa provide three models for national responses to
endemic human rights violations. The Chilean National Commission
on Truth and Reconciliation formed in 1990 extensively documented
violations but had no authority to judge those responsible. In Argentina,
the National Commission on Disappeared Persons (CONADEP), established
in 1983, published documentation of almost 9,000 unsolved "disappearances"
resulting in over 1,000 cases presented to Argentinian civilian
courts. The South African Truth Commission of 1996, chaired by Bishop
Desmond Tutu, created several subgroups to promote national reconciliation:
a Committee on Violations of Human Rights to identify victims and
review compensation proposals, a Committee on Amnesty to grant amnesty
or indemnities and a Committee on Compensation and Rehabilitation
to provide victims of human rights violations with a public forum.
Victims of serious violations have the right to file a request for
compensation. South African policy was to grant amnesty, if information
is fully disclosed about political acts. The latter are defined
as acts committed by a political organization or a member of the
security forces within the framework of obligations and authorities.(6)
In contrast,
the Moroccan Indemnity Commission began at the end -- with indemnities
-- of what should be the process for any genuine truth commission.
Indemnity as conceived by CCDH appears to recognize illegal state
practices implicitly. Compensation suggests something compensatable.
The problem of past human rights violations is posed in material
terms only, meaning that the only way for victims to be acknowledged
is for them to file claims requesting indemnification. There are
no public hearings, no attempts to provide the nation with an account
of the past and blanket amnesties were declared as part of the creation
of the Indemnity Commission. Despite much newspaper coverage, functionaries
like Youssef Kaddour, a high civil servant and known chief torturer
at Derb Moulay Cherif, the Casablanca secret detention center, and
Mahmoud Archane, former police officer and torturer at the Rabat
Commisariat and current member of Parliament, remain in place, proof
of the impunity afforded past offenders by the indemnity solution.
No one has been tried and crimes are considered unproven. Amnesty
is hotly debated where truth and reconciliation processes are available.
Mitigating circumstances are offered to hold up prosecution of many
offenders. The offender was "following orders," Morocco's
20-year statute of limitations has expired on the offense or international
human rights instruments, though ratified by Morocco, were not in
force when the offenses occurred.
| 
The
instant they get their hands on you, you stop being a man.
You're a number in the shadow of soft walls of one of those
-- shall we say -- discreet places. No worries there, a few
are found throughout the country, there's room for everybody:
Dar Moqri, Complex Kalaat MGouna, Derb Moulay Cherif, and
many more. It's at this last one that we are going to welcome
you. Your sense of smell will be strongly attracted by a subtle
mix of stuffiness, sweat, and urine, enhanced by the humid
atmosphere.
Abdelaziz
Mouride, who was a political prisoner in Morocco for 10 years
(1974-1984), smuggled these drawings out of prison page by
page to expose conditions of detention for Moroccon prisoners.
First published in France in the 1980s, his collected drawings
were published in Morocco in 2000. Reprinted with authors
permission. |
Forum for
Truth and Equity
Former political
prisoners and human rights activists responded immediately to the
Indemnity Commission's creation. An open meeting on October 10,
1999 set up a two-day conference in Casablanca on November 27-28.
At the conference, groups of former political prisoners and human
rights activists formed the Moroccan Forum for Truth and Equity
(Forum Marocain pour la Verit� et l'Equit�, or al-Muntada al-Maghribi
min ajl al-Haqiqa wa al-Insaf) and elected a 13-member executive
committee. The committee's very composition, ten men and three women,
represents a history of mass political trials and forcible disappearances:
Driss Benzekri, president (political prisoner 1974-91, Marxist-Leninist
group Ila al-Amam), Salah El-Ouadie, vice president (political prisoner
1974-84, Marxist-Leninist group "March 23 Movement"),
Khadija Rouissi, secretary general (member of the Committee for
the Families of the Disappeared and sister of Abdelhak Rouissi,
union activist forcibly disappeared in 1964), Abdelhaq Mousaddeq,
vice secretary general (political prisoner 1985-94, Ila al-Amam),
Moustafa Meftah, treasurer (political prisoner 1974-84, "March
23 Movement"), Ahmed Haou vice-treasurer (political prisoner
1984-1998, Islamist Group of 71), Abdullah Zrikem (political prisoner
1974-84, "March 23 Movement"), Nezha Bernoussi (political
prisoner 1985-91, Ila al-Amam), Abdellah El Manouzi (member of the
Committee for the Families of the Disappeared and brother of Hussein
El Manouzi, activist forcibly disappeared in 1974), Fatna Afid (daughter
of Mbarek Bensalem Afid, a political prisoner, 1971-74, Group 1971
Marrakech trials), and Hassan Mutiq (Saharan political prisoner,
1977-82, Group Meknes).
Since its formation
as a non-governmental association, the Forum has publicly insisted
that a more extensive national process -- one that resembles truth
and reconciliation commissions elsewhere -- is essential. Additional
recommendations of the Forum include public rehabilitation of the
victims, restitution of remains of "disappeared" persons
for reburial and monetary benefits to victims and relatives with
medical care, education and shelter for all those involved. According
to the Forum, the state is obliged to recognize individual suffering
with extensive official reports paying attention to individual cases.
Getting at the truth about past abuses requires cooperation from
state officials, various police forces and ministries, none of which
are prepared to cooperate. Even the number of victims is unknown.
By June 2000,
the Forum had drafted a standard form for all who suffered from
arbitrary repression or those competent to write on behalf of the
dead, the disappeared or others unable to write for themselves.
Numerous commemoration activities were organized for and by the
victims. The National Day of the Disappeared (October 29, 1999)
was memorialized with a press conference of testimonies from the
"disappeared" of Tazmamart, the Saharan groups and Group
Bnouhachem, followed by a mass demonstration in front of Parliament.
Public ceremonies commemorated the twenty-fifth anniversary of the
death under torture of Abdellatif Zeroual on November 14, and the
twenty-second anniversary of the death from hunger strike of Saida
Menebhi, a woman political prisoner, on December 11. The Forum believes
in, and has initiated, innovative performance practices to memorialize
victims in celebrations, literature, museums and school programs.
The Forum's
legal recommendations for prevention of abuses include ratification
of international treaties, an automated and publicly accessible
database on detentions and the inclusion of human rights education
at all levels of schooling, from primary to university. Morocco
is to become a state under rule of law. Parallel secret police services
(DST, DGED) should either be disbanded or placed under parliamentary
control. Driss Benzekri, Forum president, asks for the establishment
of a commission of inquiry with full powers of judicial investigation
-- the power to subpoena necessary archival or police documents
and the power to summon witnesses. But according to Benzekri, the
Moroccan approach is so far the most underdeveloped and the least
serious of international reconciliation efforts. Unlike Chad or
South Africa, Morocco has not changed regimes, a departure that
allows for a clearer treatment of past violations. In Morocco, the
regime is transforming itself from the inside, trying to become
democratic yet retaining control, a process that parallels the regime's
approach to human rights. Benzikri believes the difficulties began
when King Hassan II created the CCDH as a non-independent body with
no clear mandate or procedures.(7) A fundamental paradox resulted:
Morocco has "turned the page" without recognizing state
crimes.
Burdens
of the Past
Reconciliation
is a process. Even if the Moroccan authorities were to release information
to help establish officially a report about the past, punishing
the perpetrators may not be an outcome. Nonetheless, Fuad Ali Hima,
palace spokeperson, Omar Azziman, Minister of Justice, and Driss
Dahak, CCDH chair, have created channels of discussion between the
palace and the Forum. As advisors to the king, the Forum has demonstrated
the will to push for something resembling a truth commission for
Morocco. The disappointing early 1998 CCDH bulletin that announced
a mere 112 "disappeared" could still serve as a point
of departure for a genuine truth commission. A Commission of Verification
of the Inquiry (Commission de la Verification de l'Enquete) was
established within the CCDH in 1998. It includes Mohamed Ldidi (Director
of Prisons, Ministry of Justice) and Mohieddin Amzazi, a former
university professor who became governor in charge of the 1996 anti-narcotics
campaign and is seen as a representative of the Ministry of Interior.
The commission's original inquiry that identified 112 disappeared
could be redone, and the commission's mandate and powers be expanded.
In this way, the new king could preserve an image of continuity
with the initiatives of Hassan II's regime. Mohammed VI has made
no public criticism of his father -- in fact Moroccan law prohibits
negative commentary about members of the royal family, present and
past.(8)
Forum members
envision their actions within a larger framework. Rehabilitating
the "disappeared" and the victims of oppression with recognition
or money and jobs is only their immediate goal. They seek to rehabilitate
all of Moroccan society by abolishing the culture of impunity, fear
and victimization, and fostering in its place a confidence in democracy
and human rights upon which to build a new state. The Forum-organized
sit-in that took place at Derb Moulay Cherif on March 4, 2000, was
a complex public performance that attempted to express the shareability
of pain. Over 1,000 people formed a human chain. Participants placed
flowers on the ground in memory of the dead, brandished photographs
and posters of the many disappeared, and lit candles, holding them
aloft and placing them in a row on either side of the road leading
to the entrance gates of the prison. The imagery was stark. The
flowers are for the dead but also symbolized reconciliation; the
candles for mourning but also illuminated the community of human
rights activists silently asking for light to be shed on the dark
years and the black pages.(9) Those most wounded by torture encircled
the place that most dramatically represents their bodily pain. From
the outside, they demanded the unveiling of flagrant violations
in this center of repression and its conversion into a museum for
documentatation of the "years of lead." A circle may enclose
and exorcise but it also establishes a "cordon sanitaire"
-- keeping the people standing outside distanced from the protected
inner sanctum. For now, what is within the circle remains black,
unreadable and unknowable. The great doors to Derb Moulay Cherif
are barred shut, its torturers fully protected inside, its archives
and documentation secret. The March 4 sit-in took the form of another
circle, the halqa of the storyteller. Those encircling Derb
Moulay Cherif told the stories of their victimization and presented
living proof of the human capacity to make explicit the will to
change. There is no truth for these victims of Moroccan state repression,
and no reconciliation -- only money.
Author's
Note: Research in Morocco (summers 1996, 1997 and 1999-2000)
was funded by grants from the American Institute of Maghribi Studies
and by a Fulbright award.
Endnotes
1) Abderrahman
Benameur, "Quelques remarques sur la d�tention politique,"
al-Tadamun 2 (February 1982), and "Man huwa al-mu'taqil
al-siyasi?" al-Tadamun 3 (February 1983).
2) Text
in Driss Basri, Michel Rousset and Georges Vedel, "Avant-Propos,"
Le Maroc et les droits de l'homme (Paris: L'Harmattan, 1994),
p. vii.
3) Mohammed
VI, "Premier discours du trone," Le Matin du Sahara
et du Maghreb, August 1, 1999.
4) See
"Cr�ation d'une Commission d'arbitrage ind�pendante,"
Le Matin du Sahara et du Maghreb, August 17, 1999. The first
hearings began November 11, 1999.
5) "Maroc:
une plainte devait etre d�pos�," Le Monde, November
17, 1999.
6) Priscilla
B. Hayner, "Fifteen Truth Commissions -- 1974-1994: A Comparative
Study," Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994).
7) Mohamed
Moustaid, "L'approche marocain est la moins reflechie,"
Le Journal, December 25-31, 1999.
8) Interview
with Driss Benzekri, Rabat, June 22, 2000.
9) "Shumu'
tabhath 'an al-haqiqa," Al-Ahdath al-Maghribiyya, March
6, 2000.
|