MERIP
Middle East Report
Middle East Report Online
Newspaper Op-Eds
Contact Info
Subscribe
Back Issues
Internships
Giving
Search
Subscribe Online to
Middle East Report

Order a subscription and back issues to the award-winning magazine Middle East Report.

Click here for the order page.


SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS

Report of the Task Force for a Responsible Withdrawal from Iraq June 2008 [Click to view PDF]


Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Click here (PDF)

[Click here for HTML version]

 

 

 

MER 216 Table of Contents

Review Essay
Ruminations on Political Violence

Amy Zalman

(Amy Zalman received her Ph.D. from the Department of Middle Eastern Studies at New York University.)


Texts Reviewed
Bruce Hoffman, Inside Terrorism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).

Joseba Zulaika and William A. Douglass, Terror and Taboo: The Follies, Fables and Faces of Terrorism (New York: Routledge, 1996).

Meredith Turshen and Clotilde Twagiramariya, eds., What Women Do in Wartime: Gender and Conflict in Africa (London: Zed Books, 1998).

Suha Sabbagh, ed., Palestinian Women of Gaza and the West Bank (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998).

Yahya Yakhlif, A Lake Beyond the Wind, M. Jayyusi and C. Tingley, trans. (Interlink Books, 1999).

Yusuf al-Qaid, War in the Land of Egypt, O. Kenney, L. Kenney, and C. Tingley, trans. (Interlink Books, 1998).

Esther Raizen, ed. and trans., No Rattling of Sabers: An Anthology of Israeli War Poetry (Austin: Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Texas, 1995).


Guerrilla warfare. Revolution. Resistance. Terrorism, counter-terrorism, peacekeeping. Like contemporary wars themselves, the multiple and contradictory descriptions of violent political conflict elide conventional warfare’s clear designation of combatants and innocent victims. Whereas national armies once marched off to a marked battlefield, combatants on today’s battlefields pack the tools of their trade with them, turning everyone into a potential target. Organized political violence now engages civilians to an unprecedented extent, raising vexing questions about how to distinguish combatants from victims, and who has the right to make the distinction.

Activists, academics, novelists and poets have all appraised the consequences of this decentralized warfare. Motivated by the need to remedy the harm inflicted in wars with multiple protagonists and civilian victims, the works examined here ask how the existing international political order should respond to violence instigated by non-state actors. Should the system of nation-states modeled on Western democracies be strengthened, and warfare regulated by international conventions? Or are Western nation-states, which foster decentralized warfare by perpetrating inequalities among nations, the real problem?

The answers, like the conflicts they address, are not simple. Bruce Hoffman’s Inside Terrorism and Joseba Zulaika and William Douglass’ Terror and Taboo express polemical views on the form of political violence they label terrorism. Hoffman, former director of terrorism research at the RAND Corporation, offers a cogent history of the development of terrorist tactics since the French Revolution. Relying largely on the texts of terrorists, who he calls "violent intellectuals," Hoffman clarifies how those who resort to violence to effect political change are motivated by reason and idealism. But Hoffman’s outline of the challenges facing counter-terrorism aims to do more than prevent civilian harm. Terrorism, he tacitly claims, threatens an ideal political order in which war is only fought according to internationally agreed-upon rules. No matter how legitimate the claims of terrorists, as non-state actors they always operate outside the rule of law; their crimes are therefore difficult to prosecute. Hoffman calls for a qualitative distinction between war fought between state armies and terrorism, since only the former -- at least in theory -- is bound by rules protecting civilians from attack, and by other restraints. This otherwise reasoned logic exempts Western democracies from critical examination, as if, because they originated the system that produced international rules of war, they could not sponsor or perpetrate illegitimate violence themselves.

Anthropologists Zulaika and Douglass begin their critique of "terrorism discourse" with Hoffman’s easy acceptance of the Western prerogative to define terrorism. In their view, political violence exists, but "terrorism" is foremost a contemporary way of representing political violence. Above all, television shapes violent events into narrative fictions called "terrorism." Further, policy careers devoted to the study of terrorism, such as Hoffman’s, serve to reify certain violent political activism as terrorism. The greatest danger of "terrorism discourse" and its consequent influence upon policy, the authors contend, is that it masks the larger problem of state-sponsored violence and the daily militarism of Western society. The authors use anthropological concepts such as "taboo" and "play" to explain the degree to which the efficacy of terrorism is symbolic. In their view, once we recognize that the danger of terrorism is a function of our perception of its existence as a category of violence, we can redirect our resources away from counter-terrorist measures to combating threats like nuclear destruction.

So, Hoffman argues that we should combat the effects of violent political terror to protect the evolving international order. Zulaika and Douglass would rather attack the militarism inherent in that same order. Unfortunately, Zulaika and Douglass veil their most pointed arguments in layers of analogy and metaphor -- such as in an extended rumination on innocence, randomness and guilt with reference to Blake, or the story of Abraham and Isaac and Kierkegaard’s reading thereof.

Two books addressing civil war and resistance movements in the Third World present more nuanced debates over the role of Western democracies, and the United States in particular, in combating political violence in other parts of the world. Palestine and African nations have complicated relationships to Western states that have fostered internecine violence in the guise of universalist values. Turshen’s introduction to What Women Do in Wartime pinpoints both the military-minded West and weak state structures in Africa as the primary contributors to African civil wars. Her critique of Western militarism includes the imperative to unmask the indirect forms of warfare waged by Western states and international corporations on the underdeveloped world. At the same time, she reminds that an augmented state structure and the preservation of a basic framework of universal human rights in African nations are crucial if victims of political violence are to be protected. Turshen points out the near impossibility of enforcing humanitarian and human rights laws when abuses are perpetrated by non-state actors, or when the state does not function (or has not subscribed to the Geneva Conventions).

Enforcing human rights is especially crucial for women, who are subject to unique forms of violence, primarily rape, that have only recently been recognized as political crimes during war. What Turshen calls "privatized" violence -- war carried out in villages and homes -- draws women into conflict in new ways. The use of light weaponry like assault rifles often enables the penetration of homes, making the threat to women considerable. Since these patriarchal societies enforce collective control of women’s sexuality, rape can be an instrument of war against society as a whole. For this reason, women in societies with strict visions of women’s responsibility for "sexual" activity suffer long after the initial trauma of rape. In Turshen’s book, women’s repeated reports of rape -- as a political instrument, as a reward expected by soldiers, as an incoherent act that accompanies war -- are a repulsive testament to the failure of the international community to provide for women’s basic rights.

The excellent collection of essays in Palestinian Women of the West Bank and Gaza, edited by Suha Sabbagh, repeatedly calls attention to the victimhood of Palestinian women subjected to both sexual violence by Israeli soldiers and patriarchal backlash in their own communities. It also testifies, however, to the transformation of sexual violation from shameful to heroic during the intifada. As the essays consistently show, the decentralized nature of the Palestinian uprising contributed to raising women’s political consciousness. When their private space became a battleground, and their children soldiers in an unofficial war waged on their local streets, women themselves began to enter previously male-dominated public space. While at first they went into the streets of Gaza and the West Bank to protect their children, many eventually joined them in throwing stones. Galvanized and politicized, they demonstrated for women’s rights and formed women’s work committees in which they connected feminist goals and national aims in new and creative ways.

The works above consistently attack the desire of the globalized media to simplify complex conflict into an easily digestible story. As an antidote to facile journalism, one might turn to literary treatments of political violence that embrace the complexities and ironies of conflict. Sabbagh’s collection contains a section about culture during the intifada, including a comprehensive essay by Ilham Abu Ghazaleh about gender in intifada poetry. A recent translation of Palestinian author Yahya Yakhlif’s novel, A Lake Beyond the Wind, details the making of an army in the absence of a state. It tells the story of men who voluntarily join the Arab Liberation Army on the eve of the 1948 war, and of the emotions -- from national pride to masculine bravura -- that sustain them. Also worthy of mention is the recently translated novel, War in the Land of Egypt, a bitter comedy of errors which recounts what happens when the son of an Egyptian ‘umda’s watchman is sent to the front in the 1973 war in place of the ‘umda’s conscripted son. Although its subject is a conventional war, it pithily reminds us that even war fought by the rules is frequently rife with the very inequalities it claims to combat. Finally, No Rattling of Sabers: An Anthology of Israeli War Poetry recounts the Israeli Jewish experience of battle through the eyes of poets, civilians and soldiers. Natan Zach’s 1982 poem about the urge to quantify the victims of war reminds us how the language of political conflict is intertwined with our understanding of war’s most tragic consequences:

…the desire to be precise

Is no less human than the desire to kill, to rape, to crush, and to
exterminate

Your enemy, your opponent, your next door neighbor, the suspicious stranger, or just

Every man, woman and child in the world.

 

DonateNow

Search MERIP

MERIP OP-EDS

Western Sahara Poser for UN
Reuters (Africa Blog)
April 28, 2009
Jacob Mundy

Morocco serves as the backdrop for such Hollywood blockbusters as Gladiator, Black Hawk Down and Body of Lies. The country’s breathtaking landscapes and gritty urban neighbourhoods are the perfect setting for Hollywood’s imagination.

Unbeknown to most filmgoers, however, is that Morocco is embroiled in one of Africa’s oldest conflicts - the dispute over Western Sahara. This month the UN Security Council is expected to take up the dispute once more, providing US President Barack Obama with an opportunity to assert genuine leadership in resolving this conflict. But there’s no sign that the new administration is paying adequate attention. Full Story>>


Letters, He Gets Letters
Bitter Lemons International
March 26, 2009
Chris Toensing

Shortly before assuming office, President Barack Obama was handed a missive signed by such Washington luminaries as ex-national security advisers Zbigniew Brezezinski and Brent Scowcroft, urging him to “explore the possibility” of direct contact with Hamas. One month after he entered the White House, Obama received an epistle from Ahmad Yousef, a Gaza-based spokesman for the Islamist movement, making the same recommendation. “There can be no peace without Hamas,” Yousef told the New York Times when asked about the letter's contents. “We congratulated Mr. Obama on his presidency and reminded him that he should live up to his promise to bring real change to the region.”

There is no word, as yet, on how the foreign policy doyens' message was received, but Yousef's occasioned a huffy US rebuke of the UN Relief Works Agency, whose top official in Gaza, Karen Abu Zayd, passed the letter to Sen. John Kerry while he was visiting the devastated territory in mid-February. Even a single sealed envelope, it seems, creates the appearance that the Obama administration is breaking with the US vow, enunciated first under President George W. Bush, not to speak with Hamas until it agrees to renounce violence, abide by previous Palestinian agreements with Israel and recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Full Story>>


Elections Are Key to Darfur Crisis
The Montreal Gazette
March 7, 2009
Khalid Medani

It has been quite a week. For the first time, the international community indicted a sitting president of a sovereign state. Omar al-Bashir of Sudan stands accused by the International Criminal Court in The Hague of "crimes against humanity and war crimes" committed in the course of the Khartoum regime's brutal suppression of the revolt in the country's far western province of Darfur. Having indicted two other figures associated with the regime in 2007, ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo began building a case against the man at the top, and on Wednesday, the court issued a warrant for Bashir's arrest. Full Story>>


Out of the Rubble
The National
January 23, 2009
Mouin Rabbani

Speaking to his people on January 18, hours after Hamas responded to Israel’s unilateral suspension of hostilities with a conditional ceasefire of its own, the deposed Palestinian Authority prime minister Ismail Haniyeh devoted several passages of his prepared text to the subject of Palestinian national reconciliation. For perhaps the first time since Hamas’s June 2007 seizure of power in the Gaza Strip, an Islamist leader broached the topic of healing the Palestinian divide without mentioning Mahmoud Abbas by name.

At a press conference the following day convened by Abu Ubaida, the spokesperson of the Martyr Izz al Din al Qassam Brigades, the Hamas military wing, the movement went one step further. “The Resistance”, Abu Ubaida intoned, “is the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people”. Full Story>>


The Horrors of Israel's Peace
Al Ahram Weekly
January 22-28, 2009
Samera Esmeir

Three weeks after the war on Gaza, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire but refused to terminate its so-called defensive operations. In response, Hamas declared a ceasefire for one week, until the withdrawal of Israeli troops has been completed. For many in the West, the ceasefire might seem like an occasion to celebrate, for the cessation of military hostilities on both sides will perhaps renew the peace process. But there are reasons to be critical of this ceasefire, since it continues the situation in which Israel acts unilaterally. What we are actually witnessing is a new phase of the catastrophe in Gaza. While the characteristics of this phase are not yet known, Israel's violence has become ever more evident. And perhaps this is why Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did not mention the word "peace" once in the speech he gave to announce the ceasefire. The "peace process" might soon be revealed as the other side of the coin to war -- its continuation by other means -- that simultaneously feeds it. Full Story>>


A Battleground for the Foreseeable Future
Bitter Lemons International
September 11, 2008
Chris Toensing

Bob Woodward’s four books chronicling the wars of President George W. Bush are sensitive barometers of conventional wisdom in Washington. Whereas the first volume, published in 2002 at the height of the self-righteous nationalism gripping the capital after the September 11, 2001 attacks, hailed Bush’s self-confidence in acting to protect the homeland, the 2008 installment depicts the same man as cocksure and incurious. This much is not news. More educational are Woodward’s hints about the worldviews that will outlast this unpopular administration, embedded in the organs of the national security state. Full Story>>


Egypt Stifles Debate in the United States
Northwest Arkansas Times
August 27, 2008
Bayann Hamid

The Egyptian regime has once again succeeded in stifling freedom of speech, this time not in Egypt, but in the US. Earlier this month, an Egyptian court convicted a prominent Egyptian-American activist for his outspoken criticism of the regime’s poor human rights record in American public fora. The court accused Saad Eddin Ibrahim, of "tarnishing Egypt's image" abroad. The conviction referred primarily to writings he published in the foreign press; most notably among them an August 2007 op-ed in the Washington Post in which he criticized Egypt's human rights record and questioned the reasons behind US aid to Egypt. Full Story>>


Want to Fight Terrorism? Think Globally, Act Locally
Globe and Mail (Toronto),
August 4, 2008
Khalid Mustafa Medani

Militant Islam is under global scrutiny for clues to conditions that foster its rise, and to strategies for reversing that growth. But the key is not in Islamic doctrine, US foreign policy or formal ties to various nations, as many analysts have asserted. It lies at the community level, with clan and local leaders. Full Story>>


Iraq’s Kurds Have to Choose
Globe and Mail (Toronto)
July 30, 2008
Joost Hiltermann

Kurdish parties have become kingmakers in Baghdad , and they know it. As no federal government can work without them, they are pulling every available political lever to expand the territory and resources they control, trying to build the foundation of an independent Kurdish state. But even more than territory, they need security. If everyone acts quickly and wisely, that understanding could help resolve one of the Iraq war’s thorniest issues. Full Story>>


Exiting Iraq Is Easier Than They Say
The Nation (web-only)
July 16, 2008
Chris Toensing

The debate over the war in Iraq follows a yellowing script: The minute someone suggests that the US move to withdraw its troops, war supporters cry “Havoc!” True to form, when no less a figure than Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki stated he wants a timeline for a US pullout, John McCain summoned the specter of dire consequences. “I’ve always said we’ll come home with honor and with victory and not through a set timetable,” McCain said. In his major foreign policy speech on July 15, Barack Obama affirmed his support for a withdrawal timetable, adding that the US must “get out as carefully as we were careless getting in.” Obama’s position is the correct one, but he, like many other war critics, has done too little to counter the refrain that withdrawal is simply “cutting and running,” a recipe for disaster. Full Story>>

  Home | Contact/Intern | Background Info | Middle East Report | MER Online | Newspaper Op-Eds | Giving

Copyright © MERIP. All rights reserved.