Some
ten years after a sudden, brutal occupation, Kuwait gives, at first
sight, the appearance of having returned to normal. Virtually all
the damage done to buildings has been repaired, the oilfields are
functioning and the state has normal diplomatic relations even with
states such as Jordan, Yemen and Sudan with which it was at odds
in 1990 - 1991. The trio of al-Sabah rulers who have held office
since the late l970s -- the Amir Jabir; Shaykh Sa`d, the prime minister
and crown prince; and Shaykh Sabah, the foreign minister -- remain
in office and in power. There are even some positive consequences
of the occupation: the impact of sandstorms has been greatly reduced
by the debris of the oil fires that the Iraqi army ignited as it
departed. Oil prices are up, and businessmen and the envoys of every
Middle Eastern state throng the lobbies and anterooms.
Yet beneath
the surface of this city, the trauma of that invasion remains, and
is in some ways more intense. The shock of a sudden invasion, even
one that came when over a third of the population was out of the
country at the height of the summer heat, hit everyone: thousands
lost their lives, and offices, official buildings and private houses
were despoiled. At the Kuwait Research and Studies Center they produce
a wealth of literature on the occupation based on the half million
documents left behind as the Iraqi forces fled: testimonies of Kuwaiti
resistance from the documents of Iraqi intelligence officers, maps
of the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia for use in a possible thrust
down the coast, plans for the destruction of the oil field and lists
of goods to be taken back to Iraq (those who sacked the National
Museum knew what they were looking for). They took the animals from
the zoo. Billions of dollars worth of planes were also taken, some
to be destroyed on the ground in Iraq, some flown to Iran and then
returned, after protracted negotiations, by Tehran.
A deep, enduring
insecurity remains: Saddam Hussein has not changed one jot, everyone
knows it, and many think he could try to start the whole thing again.
Throughout the city signs point people to the nearest air raid shelter.
Maneuvers at the UN to negotiate a partial lifting of sanctions
unsettle Kuwaiti diplomats. Above all, there is the gnawing issue
of the missing: thousands have returned, but over 600 remain "disappeared,"
their names listed, their faces on posters. There is, nearly ten
years on, no news at all about them: the Iraqis refuse to confirm
or deny that they are alive. The hope that some may be alive is
sustained by the conditions in which they were rounded up, near
the end of the war, and by the recent revelation that Iraq held
Iranians for years after the Iran-Iraq war without anyone knowing.
Every family is touched directly or by near kinship.
Resistance
to Reform
Returning after
28 years I am, however, struck by other changes that accompany and
predate the Iraqi invasion. From the 1930s to the 1970s the main
axis of conflict in Kuwait was between the al-Sabah ruling family
and the merchants of Kuwait City. Some supported the al-Sabah, while
others were Arab nationalists who pressed for greater freedom and
greater control of the country's finances. In 1975 and again in
1986 the Amir dissolved the elected parliament rather than face
continued criticism. Above all, pressure for accountability after
the stock market crash seems to have spurred the second dissolution.
But from the l960s onwards the state began to draw into the political
system the more tribal Bedouin parts of the population. This was
accentuated by the Iran-Iraq war of 1980 - 88: in that war Kuwait
supported Iraq -- "we had no choice," said one official -- and relations
with the 25 percent or so of the Kuwait population who are Shi`ia
deteriorated. There was an attempt on the life of the Amir in 1985
and other incidents: the Shi`ia lost influence in the armed forces
and the administration, in favor of the tribal elements. Although
in 1990 the Shi`i population, mindful of the fate of their counterparts
in Iraq, was prominent in the resistance, the invasion placed greater
strain on the society and pushed this process of conservatism further.
The result was what one sociologist calls the "desertification"
(tashir) of Kuwait society.
The position
of the Shi`a is better than in any other Sunni Arab state. A recent
reform of the legal system has given them their own court of appeal.
They have their own MPs. The improvement of relations with Iran
after 1990 has also helped. The Iranian ambassador is reported to
have recently told Shi`i prayer leaders he did not want any trouble
from them: Iran needed good political, and financial, relations
with Kuwait.
But the rise
of a Sunni fundamentalism, backed to a greater or lesser extent
by Saudi Arabia, worries the Shi`ia as it does the liberals. The
more cautious Muslim Brotherhood, organized in al-haraka al-dusturiyya
al-islamiyya, the Islamic Constitutional Movement, claims to
have broken since 1990 with their associates elsewhere (who for
the most part supported Iraq). The more militant salafis
have links to Saudi Arabia and publish a monthly, al-Minbar.
The prime minister recently called for the closure of the sanadiq
khayriyya (charity boxes) which the fundamentalists position
around the country. The response of one Islamist leader was to say
that if the closure took place, he would call for the closure of
all unlicensed churches and Shi`ia gathering places, or husayniyyas,
in the country. When the government introduced a measure to ban
women wearing the face cover, or niqab, from driving, there
were calls for a violent response. Inexorably an extra-parliamentary
Islamist opposition is growing. There is much denunciation of al-ghazw
al-thaqafi (cultural aggression), and of taghrib, literally
"Westernization," but also any form of approximation (even to Shi`ia).
Still
No Women's Suffrage
This triangular
conflict has now crystallized around women's suffrage. Since independence
in 1961 only Kuwaiti males have had the right to vote and stand
in elections. During the Iraqi occupation the Amir promised that
women, who were part of the national resistance movement, would
be given the vote after liberation. The political class prevaricated,
so last summer, after dissolving parliament and calling new elections,
the Amir issued a decree, one of sixty, concerning the participation
of women in the next election, 2003. The opponents of women's suffrage,
joined by others who said they were in favor of this proposal but
did not want to be instructed by the Amir on political reform, voted
the measure down. It came to a vote again while I was there. As
women massed in the upper galleries of the dramatic white parliament
building, many of them wearing orange T-shirts saying "Yes to Rights
in 2003," the all-male deputies below went through their set pieces.
Applause greeted the argument by Hasan Jawhar, a political scientist,
that there was nothing in the constitution banning women from voting.
On the other side an Islamist MP told the story of a woman he knew
who had been nursing her ailing father in hospital. If she had been
an MP she would not have been able to do that. Others cited various
texts of the Qur'an and hadith. Universal patriarchal themes
dominated, packaged in local and communitarian form. In the end
prevarication, stupidity and patriarchy prevailed: the vote went
32 to 30 against women's suffrage. Some people blamed the US ambassador
for publicly supporting the suffrage campaign. It was in fact much
worse than a 30 - 32 defeat, since the "yes" camp included members
of the cabinet, nominated to parliament by the Amir.
The power of
Islamism has also shown itself in censorship. Kuwait has long had,
and still has, one of the freest media in the Arab world. But over
the past two years the annual book fair, to which publishers from
all over the Arab world come, has been subject to pressure from
Islamists. A censorship committee vets all books -- in 1998 around
40 books were banned, in 1999 the number went up to 200. These include
works on the history of Islam, writings by Muhammad Arkoun and others.
The Arabic version of my own Islam and the Myth of Confrontation
is among them. All books that refer to Islam go to a committee in
the Ministry of Awqaf. When I met the minister, `Adil Khalid al-Subayh,
he promised to find out why the book had been banned, and to write
to me. Maybe there had been a mistake in the translation, he said.
I may never know, as a few days afterward al-Subayh was relieved
of his post.
But other issues
that might have been expected to arouse concern did not: one publisher
displayed a set of translations of books by Che Guevara. The Bahraini
poet Qasim Haddad, a long-time opponent of the government on that
island, and the victim of political arrests, addressed a packed
meeting. Amongst those in the audience was the Kuwaiti writer Layla
`Uthman, who, along with another writer, was the object of a trial
relating to stories she had written ten years ago. Recently two
political scientists, Ali Baghdadi and Shamlan `Isa, were also objects
of judicial proceedings.
Kuwaiti
Politics Adrift
The failure
to get the women's suffrage measure through parliament and the general
climate of harassment of free speech highlights what is an underlying
sense in the country of political drift, or, as it is put in Arabic,
rukud (stagnation). Three examples: the new National Museum
has not been reopened after 1990, reportedly because of quarrelling
within the royal family; a decision on building an aluminum smelter
has been stalled for years, because of lack of authorization of
terms and uncertainty about the midsummer reliability and price
of electricity; negotiations with foreign oil companies about opening
up new oil fields in the north are marooned for lack of agreement
on concession terms.
Those who do
speak out may encounter discrimination. There has been no repeat
of the assassination attempt on a critical left-wing MP soon after
liberation, but less abrupt forms of pressure, as much from below
as from above, persist. In ministries and academic institutions,
there is a noticeable frustration with the lack of change. A classic
case of paralysis is the English-language Kuwaiti TV news: this
is a parody of official Arabic broadcasting, as endless wooden and
padded statements about the actions of the rulers are read out in
deadpan American English by announcers clad in dishdashas. One person
who taught in an English literature department told me that they
could not work on writers from America or Australia because this
was not recognized as "English." The list of books and poems that
teachers are allowed to give their students to read is narrowing,
as more and more come under a vague, unofficial but inexorable Islamist
ban. No Iris Murdoch, for instance, because she favors gays and
lesbians. A safe canon remains -- Chaucer, Herbert, Joseph Conrad.
However, Kuwait
has, in marked contrast to its neighbors, a climate of extensive
religious tolerance. There are no Sunni mosques in Tehran, nor are
there Shi`i places of worship in Saudi Arabia. The latter allows
no signs of public Christian worship. In Kuwait, by contrast, the
two Islamic sects live side by side, and Christians practice openly.
At the cluster of churches near the Sheraton Hotel, mass is said
in English, Arabic (Latin and Maronite rites) and the tongues of
the Asian south -- Tamil, Tagalog, Konkani, Mayalayam. At al-Ahmadi
in the south, worshippers visit "Our Lady of Arabia."
Americans got a crash course on Yemen for Christmas.
That’s
because we’ve wanted to know more about the little-known, dirt-poor
country in southwestern Arabia where the “underwear bomber” who
tried to blow up a plane—bound for Detroit from Nigeria on
Christmas Day—says he was trained. President Barack Obama says,
correctly, that “large chunks” of Yemen “are not
fully under government control.” So it seems to make sense
to strengthen the Yemeni government, to get at “al-Qaeda in
the Arabian Peninsula,” as the local gang of Islamist extremists
is known. Full Story>>
Bethlehem,
Palestine is a special place to celebrate Christmas. It’s
home to the Church of the Nativity and the field where shepherds, tending
their flocks by night, spotted the star heralding Jesus’ birth.
But apart from the historical mystique, here in Bethlehem we celebrate
Christmas much like Christians throughout the world. We hang lights
from the rooftops. We erect a tree in Manger Square. We host a Christmas
market. Our children carol and perform Christmas pageants. Christmas
in Bethlehem, as elsewhere, is a time for family, peace, love and joy. Full
Story>>
For
the past two months, President Barack Obama has been weighing Gen.
Stanley McChrystal’s request to send an additional 40,000 troops
to Afghanistan to “disrupt, dismantle and defeat” al-Qaeda.
That same effort, according to Obama, entails ensuring that the Taliban
can’t regain control of the country. But a military strategy
alone won’t beat al-Qaeda or the Taliban. Achieving lasting
stability in Afghanistan will require national political reconciliation,
the establishment of a functioning, accountable political system,
and a credible government. In this respect, the outcome of Afghanistan’s
presidential election, marred by cheating, was a step in the wrong
direction. Full
story>>
So
much is still unknown about the shooting at Fort Hood Army base and
the motives of the alleged shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, but still
I have that same queasy feeling in my stomach that I've had before:
this will not be good for Muslims. Full
Story>>
Morocco
serves as the backdrop for such Hollywood blockbusters as Gladiator,
Black Hawk Down and Body of Lies. The country’s breathtaking
landscapes and gritty urban neighbourhoods are the perfect setting
for Hollywood’s imagination.
Unbeknown
to most filmgoers, however, is that Morocco is embroiled in one of
Africa’s oldest conflicts - the dispute over Western
Sahara. This month the UN Security Council is expected to take up the
dispute once more, providing US President Barack Obama with an opportunity
to assert genuine leadership in resolving this conflict. But there’s
no sign that the new administration is paying adequate attention. Full
Story>>
Shortly
before assuming office, President Barack Obama was handed a missive
signed by such Washington luminaries as ex-national security advisers
Zbigniew Brezezinski and Brent Scowcroft, urging him to “explore
the possibility” of direct contact with Hamas. One month after
he entered the White House, Obama received an epistle from Ahmad Yousef,
a Gaza-based spokesman for the Islamist movement, making the same recommendation. “There
can be no peace without Hamas,” Yousef told the New York Times
when asked about the letter's contents. “We congratulated Mr.
Obama on his presidency and reminded him that he should live up to
his promise to bring real change to the region.”
There
is no word, as yet, on how the foreign policy doyens' message was
received, but Yousef's occasioned a huffy US rebuke of the UN Relief
Works Agency, whose top official in Gaza, Karen Abu Zayd, passed the
letter to Sen. John Kerry while he was visiting the devastated territory
in mid-February. Even a single sealed envelope, it seems, creates the
appearance that the Obama administration is breaking with the US vow,
enunciated first under President George W. Bush, not to speak with
Hamas until it agrees to renounce violence, abide by previous Palestinian
agreements with Israel and recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Full
Story>>
It
has been quite a week. For the first time, the international community
indicted a sitting president of a sovereign state. Omar al-Bashir
of Sudan stands accused by the International Criminal Court in The
Hague of "crimes against humanity and war crimes" committed
in the course of the Khartoum regime's brutal suppression of the
revolt in the country's far western province of Darfur. Having indicted
two other figures associated with the regime in 2007, ICC prosecutor
Luis Moreno Ocampo began building a case against the man at the top,
and on Wednesday, the court issued a warrant for Bashir's arrest.
Full Story>>
Speaking
to his people on January 18, hours after Hamas responded to Israel’s
unilateral suspension of hostilities with a conditional ceasefire
of its own, the deposed Palestinian Authority prime minister Ismail
Haniyeh devoted several passages of his prepared text to the subject
of Palestinian national reconciliation. For perhaps the first time
since Hamas’s June 2007 seizure of power in the Gaza Strip,
an Islamist leader broached the topic of healing the Palestinian divide
without mentioning Mahmoud Abbas by name.
At
a press conference the following day convened by Abu Ubaida, the
spokesperson of the Martyr Izz al Din al Qassam Brigades, the Hamas
military wing, the movement went one step further. “The Resistance”,
Abu Ubaida intoned, “is the legitimate representative of the
Palestinian people”. Full Story>>
Three
weeks after the war on Gaza, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire
but refused to terminate its so-called defensive operations. In response,
Hamas declared a ceasefire for one week, until the withdrawal of
Israeli troops has been completed. For many in the West, the ceasefire
might seem like an occasion to celebrate, for the cessation of military
hostilities on both sides will perhaps renew the peace process. But
there are reasons to be critical of this ceasefire, since it continues
the situation in which Israel acts unilaterally. What we are actually
witnessing is a new phase of the catastrophe in Gaza. While the characteristics
of this phase are not yet known, Israel's violence has become ever
more evident. And perhaps this is why Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
did not mention the word "peace" once in the speech he gave
to announce the ceasefire. The "peace process" might soon
be revealed as the other side of the coin to war -- its continuation
by other means -- that simultaneously feeds it. Full Story>>
Bob
Woodward’s four books chronicling the wars of President
George W. Bush are sensitive barometers of conventional wisdom in Washington.
Whereas the first volume, published in 2002 at the height of the self-righteous
nationalism gripping the capital after the September 11, 2001 attacks,
hailed Bush’s self-confidence in acting to protect the homeland,
the 2008 installment depicts the same man as cocksure and incurious.
This much is not news. More educational are Woodward’s hints
about the worldviews that will outlast this unpopular administration,
embedded in the organs of the national security state. Full
Story>>
The
Egyptian regime has once again succeeded in stifling freedom of speech,
this time not in Egypt, but in the US. Earlier this month, an Egyptian
court convicted a prominent Egyptian-American activist for his outspoken
criticism of the regime’s poor human
rights record in American public fora. The court accused Saad Eddin
Ibrahim, of "tarnishing Egypt's image" abroad. The conviction
referred primarily to writings he published in the foreign press; most
notably among them an August 2007 op-ed in the Washington Post in which
he criticized Egypt's human rights record and questioned the reasons
behind US aid to Egypt. Full
Story>>
Militant
Islam is under global scrutiny for clues to conditions that foster
its rise, and to strategies for reversing that growth. But the key
is not in Islamic doctrine, US foreign policy or formal ties to various
nations, as many analysts have asserted. It lies at the community
level, with clan and local leaders. Full
Story>>
Kurdish
parties have become kingmakers in Baghdad , and they know it. As
no federal government can work without them, they are pulling every
available political lever to expand the territory and resources they
control, trying to build the foundation of an independent Kurdish state.
But even more than territory, they need security. If everyone acts
quickly and wisely, that understanding could help resolve one of the
Iraq war’s thorniest issues. Full
Story>>
The
debate over the war in Iraq follows a yellowing script: The minute
someone suggests that the US move to withdraw its troops, war supporters
cry “Havoc!”
True to form, when no less a figure than Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki stated he wants a timeline for a US pullout, John McCain
summoned the specter of dire consequences. “I’ve always
said we’ll come home with honor and with victory and not through
a set timetable,” McCain said. In his major foreign policy speech
on July 15, Barack Obama affirmed his support for a withdrawal timetable,
adding that the US must “get out as carefully as we were careless
getting in.” Obama’s position is the correct one, but he,
like many other war critics, has done too little to counter the refrain
that withdrawal is simply
“cutting and running,” a recipe for disaster. Full
Story>>