|
Women
and Gender in Middle East Studies: Trends, Prospects & Challenges
Simona Sharoni
In the past two decades, there has been growing interest
in the study of women and gender issues in the Middle East, reflected
in the greater number of books, journal articles, dissertations and
conference panels devoted to such topics.1 As a
result, many scholars in Middle East studies have come to view the
study of women and gender in the Middle East as a field in and of
itself.2 Elizabeth Fernea's 1986 presidential address
to the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) is considered a milestone
in the evolution of Middle East women's studies as a distinct field
of inquiry.3 Marking the occasion of MESA's 20th
anniversary as well as the founding meeting of the Association of
Middle Eastern Women's Studies (AMEWS), Fernea gave an optimistic
account of the contribution of women's studies to all areas of Middle
East studies. She concluded that women's studies, like Middle East
studies, has come of age as a field. It has not only carried us, as
ethnocentric Westerners, into previously unexplored areas of the world
which we thought we knew, but it has also opened new areas of inquiry
for ourselves and our students.4
Critics, however, have argued that the greater visibility of scholarship
on women and gender issues in the Middle East does not necessarily
signify a conclusive triumph nor a qualitative transformation in
gender awareness within the field. In 1988, less than two years
after Fernea's address, the MESA Bulletin published an article
by Margot Badran that offered a more cautious review of the emerging
field of Middle East women's studies and critically examined the
potential for, and obstacles to, its institutionalization.5
Badran challenged the widely held view that Middle East women's
studies emerged as a distinct field only in the late 1970s with
the publication of Elizabeth Fernea and Basima Bezirgan's Middle
Eastern Muslim Women Speak and Lois Beck and Nikki Keddie's
Women in the Muslim World.6 In contrast,
she pointed out that "a generation earlier, foreshadowing the creation
of the new field, Zahiyya Dughan, a Lebanese delegate to the Arab
Women's Conference in Cairo in 1944, called upon Arab universities
to accord the intellectual and literary heritage of Arab women a
place in the curriculum by creating chairs for the study of women's
writing."7
In addition to placing the development of Middle East women's studies
in the Western academy in the broader context of Arab women's scholarship
and activism, Badran's article assessed the representation of women's
studies and gender issues at MESA conferences. She pointed out that
the first papers on women and gender issues at MESA--12 papers and
two panels--were delivered in 1973 and that, following a slight
increase in 1974, the number of panels stayed the same in 1975.
Despite this fairly impressive beginning, Badran described a "slump
period from 1976 through 1983 when the number of papers diminished."8
In 1984, however, there was a dramatic increase in papers on women
and gender issues (37), yet the number dropped to 19 in 1985. Badran
used these numbers to illustrate her more cautious argument about
the persistent challenges facing scholars working in this field.
She concluded that "the study of women remains marginal within Middle
East studies, while women's studies still remain largely centered
on the West."9
Given these contrasting views, it is helpful to examine what has
changed in the representation of women and gender issues in Middle
East studies over the past decade as documented in MESA conference
programs, membership directories and graduate and undergraduate
course listings. As the table below demonstrates, whereas the number
of panels devoted solely to women and/or gender issues has not changed
dramatically in the past decade, there has been a slight increase
in the percentage.10 Perhaps the most interesting
trend highlighted in the table involves the increase in the number
of women and gender papers on non-gender panels. This number has
steadily grown in the past decade from four papers in 1986 to 28
in 1997, indicating an increase in the overall representation of
women and gender issues on the conference program. This accomplishment
reflects a conscious attempt by scholars to present their work on
general panels in order "to have gender issues become a fully integrated
part of academic inquiry."11 Indeed, there has
been a noticeable increase in the number of scholars who included
women and/or gender issues in their research interests. In the 1996
MESA directory, for example, 381 members mentioned these issues,
compared to 150 in 1992 and only 79 in 1986.12
These numbers lend some support to the optimistic claim that women
and gender issues are moving closer to the center of the research
and teaching agenda in Middle East studies. But if this is indeed
the case, one would also expect to find a large number of course
offerings on women and gender issues in the Middle East. Yet, the
1995-1996 MESA Directory of Graduate and Undergraduate Programs
and Courses lists only 46 courses with women and or gender issues
in the title offered in North American institutions and four in
other parts of the world. In other words, the vast majority of the
full-time faculty who listed women and gender issues as one of their
research interests do not teach a course on these issues. It is
possible, however, that many have integrated these issues into other
courses on the region, and that additional courses on these issues
are occasionally taught under the category of "special topics."
Nevertheless, the overall picture suggests that the project of integrating
women and gender issues into the Middle East studies curriculum
is far from complete.
This problem may be related to the challenges facing Middle East
studies more generally due to its interdisciplinary nature. Despite
the lip-service paid to interdisciplinary scholarship and teaching,
curriculum changes occur primarily at the departmental level. Thus,
scholars who teach in institutions without Middle East studies programs
encounter the double challenge of developing and teaching Middle
East courses as well as pushing for the integration of women and
gender issues into their discipline's curriculum. Some disciplines
are more hospitable to the integration of women and gender issues
into their undergraduate and graduate curricula than others. Topping
the list of home disciplines for those scholars who declared women
and gender studies among their research interests are anthropology
with 74 scholars, history with 72, political science with 35, literature
with 32, sociology with 30, Middle East/Near East studies with 21
and women's studies with 20 scholars.
Badran concluded her 1988 article with the recommendation "to
accelerate the institutionalization of Middle East women's studies
within the context of Middle East studies."13
Yet the efforts of the past two decades have not transformed curricula.
Since there are many more scholars interested in these issues today
compared to a decade ago, we should step up our efforts to integrate
women and gender studies into the curricula both within our home
departments and in interdisciplinary programs, such as women's studies,
cultural studies and general education. Whenever possible these
efforts should be related to existing university initiatives designed
to diversify and internationalize the curriculum.
One cannot overemphasize the importance of cultivating the relationship
between scholars interested in women and gender studies in the Middle
East and women and gender studies programs in general. On a pragmatic
level, in addition to being natural allies in struggles concerning
curriculum transformation, women's studies programs have served
as support systems for scholars working on women and gender issues
in the Middle East and have been indispensable in several tenure
battles of feminist scholars. On a theoretical level, it is imperative
that we keep up with debates within feminist theory as well as with
the expansive body of literature on women and gender studies in
other parts of the world. On a political level, we should take advantage
of the relative space that exists in most women's studies programs
to raise critical and provocative questions concerning such issues
as the representation of non-Western women and the cultural origins
of certain gender practices. Since media representations of women
and gender practices in the Middle East tend to be sensationalist
and stereotypical, it is our task to counter these simplistic portrayals
with more nuanced images and sophisticated analyses.
Similar initiatives are necessary within the field of Middle East
studies. Scholars who write on women and gender issues have been
at the forefront of theoretical, methodological and political debates
in the field and it is important that we not only continue to participate
in these discussions but also that we play a more active role in
defining the terms of such debates. This implies moving beyond the
"add women and stir" approach to an emphasis on gender analysis
as a way to unravel structured inequalities, power asymmetries and
patterns of inclusion and exclusion. This agenda would transform
the field of Middle East studies so that women and gender issues
become central rather than marginal. Toward this end, we must make
explicit the gendered nature of the field and its theoretical, methodological
and political underpinnings. On a more pragmatic level this project
implies asking such questions as why only two women have been chosen
since 1986 to be MESA's Annual Meeting Visiting Scholars and why
the 1993 MESA conference was the only time in the past decade that
women and gender issues were featured on special plenary sessions.14
These questions are not designed to spoil the celebration of the
important gains we have made in a relatively short time but rather
to point out that critical issues concerning the integration of
women and gender studies within Middle East studies remain. To overcome
the challenges facing us we must explore new ways to make Middle
East studies more hospitable to feminist and gender analysis and
to make our scholarship more relevant to the daily struggles of
ordinary women and men in the Middle East.
Simona Sharoni, assistant
professor of peace and conflict resolution at American University,
is author of Gender and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: The
Politics of Women's Resistance (Syracuse: Syracuse University
Press, 1995). The author wishes to thank her research assistant, Nobue
Onishi, for her invaluable contribution to this project and Steve
Niva for his useful comments and careful editing.
Endnotes
1 A library search using "women," "gender" and
"Middle East" as key words shows that almost 100 books and over 275
journal articles, including book reviews, have been published on these
topics in the past decade. This number includes only English language
publication and does not include contributions to edited volumes,
dealing either with the Middle East or with women and gender issues
in other parts of the world. Another interesting trend involves the
growing number of doctoral dissertations on the topic.
2 See for example Beth Baron, "A Field Matures:
Recent Literature on Women in the Middle East," Middle Eastern
Studies 32/3 (July 1996), pp. 172-86.
3 During the first two decades the discourse
has stressed mostly "women," and "women's studies." In the past
decade, however, the word "gender" has become more central to these
debates. This development has been influenced by similar trends
in women's studies.
4 Elizabeth Fernea, "MESA Presidential Address,
1986," MESA Bulletin 21 (1987), p. 7.
5 Margot Badran, "The Institutionalization
of Middle East Women's Studies in the United States," MESA Bulletin
22 (1988), pp. 9-18. The article was the basis of a presentation
at the 1987 MESA conference as part of a panel titled "Studying
Middle Eastern Women: The First Two Decades," chaired by Elizabeth
Fernea. This panel, brought together participants on the 1974 MESA
panel, titled "Middle East Women," also chaired by Elizabeth Fernea,
in an attempt to review interim developments in Middle East women's
studies.
6 Elizabeth Warnock Fernea and Basima Quattan
Bezirgan, eds., Middle Eastern Women Speak (Austin: University
of Texas Press, 1977); Lois Beck and Nikki Keddie, eds., Women
in the Muslim World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1978).
7 Badran, ibid., p. 9.
8 Ibid, p. 11.
9 Ibid, p. 9.
10 The table reflects the total number of
panels and papers on women and gender presented at MESA from 1986
through 1997. Papers on the first panel dealing with sexuality (1997
conference) were also included in this category. The table distinguishes
between panels that focus solely on women and gender issues and
general panels that include one or more papers on women and/or gender
issues. Papers and panels were classified based on their titles.
I am aware, however, that there may have been papers which addressed
gender issues without stating this in the title.
11 Correspondence with Eleanor Doumato,
editor of the AMEWS Review, October 26, 1997.
12 A closer examination of the profile of
scholars interested in women and/or gender issues, featured in the
1996 MESA membership directory, reveals that 237 hold permanent
academic positions, 118 are graduate students and 26 are professionals
working in the field but not in academic institutions. The 1986
numbers are taken from Badran, ibid., p. 14.
13 Badran, ibid., p. 17.
14 Deniz Kandiyoti was the visiting scholar
in 1993 and Hanan al-Shaykh in 1994.
|
