During the past
two decades, a proselytizing, reformist, "Islamist" movement--mainly
characterized as "Wahhabi"--has gained increasing popularity throughout
Yemen. Wahhabism actively opposes both the main Yemeni schools--Zaydi
Shi'ism in the north and Shafi'i-Sunnism in the south and in the
Tihamah. It is closely connected with the political party Islah,
a coalition of tribal, mercantile and religious interests that pursues
a mixed social and political agenda.1
Though little
is known of Yemeni Wahhabism, it appears to have a particularly
strong following in the northern Province of Sa'dah where some of
its leading figures are based. Given that this region is in the
Zaydi heartlands of northern Yemen, the popularity there of Wahhabism
is surprising. Nevertheless Wahhabism has flourished in the mountains
of Razih in the west of the province precisely because it has successfully
mobilized a hitherto dormant resentment of key tenets of Zaydism.
Wahhabism may have been sown, as some suggest, with foreign finance
and encouragement, but it only took root because the soil was fertile.
Wahhabism
was introduced into the province of Sa'dah by local men who had
converted while studying religion in Saudi Arabia or fighting with
the mujahidin in Afghanistan. Upon their return to the Sa'dah
region, they set up lesson circles, religious institutes and Wahhabi
mosques.
Beginning
in the mid-1980s, the tribally-organized communities of Razih became
riven by sectarian conflict as a fervent and growing minority of
Wahhabi-Sunni converts confronted the majority of Zaydi-Shi'a.2
The Wahhabis, as others dub them (or Sunnis as they prefer to be
called), gained key positions in state schools, opened religious
teaching institutes and established or took over a number of mosques.
These activists were mainly young men (shabab) from a wide
range of "tribal" (qabili) and low-status "butcher" families.3
These youths were attracted to Islah (which they equated with Wahhabism)
because of its effective social welfare programs, and to Wahhabism
because of its opposition to the Zaydi religious elite (sadah,
singular sayyid), its direct, unmediated relationship to
God, its egalitarianism and what they saw as its clear, logical
doctrines. A major factor in their conversion was literacy; these
shabab were among the first generation to attend secondary
school. They had the skills, therefore, to study the plethora of
religious publications flooding Yemen at that time.
In addition
to the shabab, a minority of older men--mainly tribal leaders
(shaikhs and others)--tacitly supported the Wahhabi-Islah movement
in part because their traditional political positions were bolstered
by Islah and its powerful leader, Shaikh 'Abdullah al-Ahmar, and
in part because they approved of the anti-sayyid thrust of
the movement. The relationship between tribal leaders and prominent
sayyids has always been one of intermittent rivalry. Sayyids are,
predictably, aligned entirely on the Zaydi side of the conflict
and are supported by the national political party, al-Haqq,4
which was formed primarily to defend Zaydism against the Wahhabi
challenge.
Although sayyids
have not been revered indiscriminately in Razih previously, they
and their claim to descent from the Prophet Muhammad through his
son-in-law 'Ali have been respected by the majority of people. They
maintained their high social standing despite the 1960s civil war
which had aimed to eliminate their privileges. The Wahhabis primarily
resented not the important official posts certain sayyids had secured
under the Republican government, but their religious authority and
influence, as well as their religious claims to nobility.
The Wahhabis
accused the sayyids of blocking access to the "truths" of Sunni
doctrine, of propagating superstitious beliefs and practices and
of perpetuating social stratification by asserting their divinely-sanctioned
social superiority. They accused them of reinforcing sayyid
exclusivity by refusing to marry their daughters to non-sayyids--a
particularly bitter point of contention. Razih, however, is replete
with marriage prohibitions and preferences, and no tribe will yet
intermarry with "butcher" families--an Achilles heel which sayyids
were quick to exploit with reciprocal taunts of social prejudice.
Sayyids countered
by accusing the Wahhabis of propagating their religion for money
and of importing a religious school of thought from Saudi Arabia
that was innappropriate for Yemen. Zaydism, they asserted, was an
authentically Yemeni school, and they were its prime upholders.
Although sayyids had formerly portrayed themselves as immigrant
"northeners" (Adnanis) in contrast to other Yemenis, who were indigenous
"southerners" (Qahtanis), in this new context they sought to emphasize
their Yemeni identity.5
The Wahhabi
opposition to sayyids and Zaydism also stimulated the emergence
of a new generation of Zaydi `ulema' with non-sayyid,
tribal status. These charismatic and ambitious young men vigorously
championed the Zaydi madhhab through teaching and religious
pamphleteering, and by encouraging Zaydi rituals. In so doing, they
predictably found themselves in competition with the sayyids of
their own sects.6
A striking
feature of the sectarian conflict in Razih was the tremendous symbolic
and emotional emphasis placed on spiritual and ritual matters, with
each side accusing the other of heretical beliefs and practices.
The greatest source of daily friction was the prayer ritual. Wahhabis
made a point of attending Zaydi mosques and, while the majority
of the congregation resolutely adhered to the customary Zaydi prayer
stance with arms extended, the Wahhabis provocatively prayed in
the Sunni manner, folding their arms during the prayer sequence,
and, contrary to the Zaydi practice, chanting "amin" (like
the Christian "amen").7
In 1991, a
major Zaydi reaction to the Wahhabi challenge occurred during a
public ceremony to mark the anniversary of `Id al-Ghadir when Shi`a
Muslims believe the Prophet designated `Ali as his successor. The
loud speeches, general clamor and celebratory gunfire of this ceremony,
which attracted men from all over Razih, dramatically and defiantly
flaunted Zaydi numbers and enthusiasm in the face of the leading
Wahhabi activist of Razih, who lived near the ceremonial ground.
The Zaydi-Wahhabi
rivalry intensified. Wahhabis attempted to take over the major mosque
of Razih, which had become the centre for Zaydi activists. The Wahhabis
imported skilled preachers from elsewhere in Yemen to deliver Friday
sermons, tried to install their own mosque officials, and assertively
prayed in the Sunni mode--all strenuously opposed by the Zaydis.
In one incident, tussles took place over the microphone and when
the Wahhabis aggressively intoned "amin," the Zaydi congregation
defiantly bellowed "kadhabin" (liars) in response!
As the `Id
al-Ghadir of 1992 approached, the Wahhabis waged a fierce campaign
against Zaydi celebrations, threatening violence, and there were
armed standoffs in the main mosque. This tense situation reached
a bloody climax with the murder of the son of the leading Wahhabi
on the eve of `Id al-Ghadir--a shockingly dishonorable crime by
tribal standards, because it was disproportionate to the provocation.
Two years
later, the leading Wahhabi on policing duties with the local governor,
having pursued his investigation and satisfied himself on the identity
of his son's assassin, returned to Razih and shot dead an obscure
sayyid. Thus he avenged his son's anonymous and secretive
murder openly and honorably. Eventually, this was deemed a revenge
killing in accordance with shari`a and the matter was closed.
After this
incident the conflict subsided. Both sides felt things had gone
too far and wanted to avoid provoking further government intervention.
Local conflicts were also overshadowed by the 1994 war between north
and south Yemen, and a deterioration in the Yemeni economy. As people
concentrated on economic survival, religious differences were de-emphasized
and Wahhabis and Zaydis concentrated on promoting their respective
madhdhabs through religious schools and institutes.8
The dramatic
and confrontational aspects of this "clash of fundamentalisms" subsided
because those divided by religious conflict are linked by economic
interests among networks of close neighborhood and marriage. Leading
sayyids have marriage links with leading Wahhabi families which
predate this conflict. The social status of sayyids, however, may
be vulnerable unless they modify their conduct and precepts, particularly
their adherence to the principal of descent-based social primacy.
In an early sign of such a compromise a female sayyid (sharifah)
recently married a tribesman--predictably a wealthy merchant. The
significance of this first small breach in the bastion of sayyid
exclusivity did not go unnoticed. Crowds of men converged from all
over Razih to celebrate, singing the following song:
Oh sayyids,
you tricked us
With your turbans, remedies and charms
Whenever we proposed marriage, you said
"With a sharifah, a sayyid's daughter? It's not allowed."
God only knows whose book you studied!
Author's
Note This article is based on information collected during 14
months of anthropological field work in Razih between 1977 and 1980,
a further three months of fieldwork in the winter of 1992-93, a
visit to Sana`a in 1994, and interviews in London. A version of
the article was presented at the Middle East Studies Association
of North America (MESA) meeting in 1995. I am grateful to Gabriele
vom Bruck, Sheila Carapico, Ianthe Maclagan and Madawi al-Rasheed
for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Shelagh
Weir, former Middle East curator for the British Museum, is
an independent writer and researcher.
Endnotes
1 Islah
gained 62 out of 301 parliamentary seats in the first Yemeni nationwide
multiparty elections in 1993 (Sheila Carapico, "Elections and Mass
Politics in Yemen," Middle East Report 23, November-December
1994, p.3).
2 There
are no accurate figures to indicate the size of Wahhabi support
in Razih, but according to figures provided by local informants,
the Islah party received about 20 percent of the vote in the first
national election in 1994 (with five parties standing).
3 People
of qabili status comprise about 90 percent of the Razih population,
"butchers" (who pursue a variety of occupations, not only butchery)
about 5 percent, and the religious elite (sadah, singular sayyid)
the remaining five percent.
4 After
the 1997 elections, Islah lost all cabinet seats to the ruling party,
while al-Haqq picked up a single post, the Awqaf (Islamic endowments)
ministry.
5 I
am grateful to Gabriele vom Bruck for pointing out this switch in
self-identification.
6 See
Bernard Haykel, "A Zaydi Revival?" Yemen Update 36/1995.
7 For
the historical importance of prayer ritual for Zaydi identity, see
Bernard Haykel, "Al-Shawkani and the jurisprudential unity of Yemen,"
in Michel Tuchscherer, ed., Le Yémen: Passé et
Présent de L'Unité. Revue du Monde Musulman et de
la Méditerranée (Edisud, 1994).
8 For
the recent upsurge in formal Zaydi education, see Abdelmalik Eagle,
"Yemeni Zaydis: the Imamate and its aftermath," Middle East International,
June 1995, and Haykel, op.cit.
Americans got a crash course on Yemen for Christmas.
That’s
because we’ve wanted to know more about the little-known, dirt-poor
country in southwestern Arabia where the “underwear bomber” who
tried to blow up a plane—bound for Detroit from Nigeria on
Christmas Day—says he was trained. President Barack Obama says,
correctly, that “large chunks” of Yemen “are not
fully under government control.” So it seems to make sense
to strengthen the Yemeni government, to get at “al-Qaeda in
the Arabian Peninsula,” as the local gang of Islamist extremists
is known. Full Story>>
Bethlehem,
Palestine is a special place to celebrate Christmas. It’s
home to the Church of the Nativity and the field where shepherds, tending
their flocks by night, spotted the star heralding Jesus’ birth.
But apart from the historical mystique, here in Bethlehem we celebrate
Christmas much like Christians throughout the world. We hang lights
from the rooftops. We erect a tree in Manger Square. We host a Christmas
market. Our children carol and perform Christmas pageants. Christmas
in Bethlehem, as elsewhere, is a time for family, peace, love and joy. Full
Story>>
For
the past two months, President Barack Obama has been weighing Gen.
Stanley McChrystal’s request to send an additional 40,000 troops
to Afghanistan to “disrupt, dismantle and defeat” al-Qaeda.
That same effort, according to Obama, entails ensuring that the Taliban
can’t regain control of the country. But a military strategy
alone won’t beat al-Qaeda or the Taliban. Achieving lasting
stability in Afghanistan will require national political reconciliation,
the establishment of a functioning, accountable political system,
and a credible government. In this respect, the outcome of Afghanistan’s
presidential election, marred by cheating, was a step in the wrong
direction. Full
story>>
So
much is still unknown about the shooting at Fort Hood Army base and
the motives of the alleged shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, but still
I have that same queasy feeling in my stomach that I've had before:
this will not be good for Muslims. Full
Story>>
Morocco
serves as the backdrop for such Hollywood blockbusters as Gladiator,
Black Hawk Down and Body of Lies. The country’s breathtaking
landscapes and gritty urban neighbourhoods are the perfect setting
for Hollywood’s imagination.
Unbeknown
to most filmgoers, however, is that Morocco is embroiled in one of
Africa’s oldest conflicts - the dispute over Western
Sahara. This month the UN Security Council is expected to take up the
dispute once more, providing US President Barack Obama with an opportunity
to assert genuine leadership in resolving this conflict. But there’s
no sign that the new administration is paying adequate attention. Full
Story>>
Shortly
before assuming office, President Barack Obama was handed a missive
signed by such Washington luminaries as ex-national security advisers
Zbigniew Brezezinski and Brent Scowcroft, urging him to “explore
the possibility” of direct contact with Hamas. One month after
he entered the White House, Obama received an epistle from Ahmad Yousef,
a Gaza-based spokesman for the Islamist movement, making the same recommendation. “There
can be no peace without Hamas,” Yousef told the New York Times
when asked about the letter's contents. “We congratulated Mr.
Obama on his presidency and reminded him that he should live up to
his promise to bring real change to the region.”
There
is no word, as yet, on how the foreign policy doyens' message was
received, but Yousef's occasioned a huffy US rebuke of the UN Relief
Works Agency, whose top official in Gaza, Karen Abu Zayd, passed the
letter to Sen. John Kerry while he was visiting the devastated territory
in mid-February. Even a single sealed envelope, it seems, creates the
appearance that the Obama administration is breaking with the US vow,
enunciated first under President George W. Bush, not to speak with
Hamas until it agrees to renounce violence, abide by previous Palestinian
agreements with Israel and recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Full
Story>>
It
has been quite a week. For the first time, the international community
indicted a sitting president of a sovereign state. Omar al-Bashir
of Sudan stands accused by the International Criminal Court in The
Hague of "crimes against humanity and war crimes" committed
in the course of the Khartoum regime's brutal suppression of the
revolt in the country's far western province of Darfur. Having indicted
two other figures associated with the regime in 2007, ICC prosecutor
Luis Moreno Ocampo began building a case against the man at the top,
and on Wednesday, the court issued a warrant for Bashir's arrest.
Full Story>>
Speaking
to his people on January 18, hours after Hamas responded to Israel’s
unilateral suspension of hostilities with a conditional ceasefire
of its own, the deposed Palestinian Authority prime minister Ismail
Haniyeh devoted several passages of his prepared text to the subject
of Palestinian national reconciliation. For perhaps the first time
since Hamas’s June 2007 seizure of power in the Gaza Strip,
an Islamist leader broached the topic of healing the Palestinian divide
without mentioning Mahmoud Abbas by name.
At
a press conference the following day convened by Abu Ubaida, the
spokesperson of the Martyr Izz al Din al Qassam Brigades, the Hamas
military wing, the movement went one step further. “The Resistance”,
Abu Ubaida intoned, “is the legitimate representative of the
Palestinian people”. Full Story>>
Three
weeks after the war on Gaza, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire
but refused to terminate its so-called defensive operations. In response,
Hamas declared a ceasefire for one week, until the withdrawal of
Israeli troops has been completed. For many in the West, the ceasefire
might seem like an occasion to celebrate, for the cessation of military
hostilities on both sides will perhaps renew the peace process. But
there are reasons to be critical of this ceasefire, since it continues
the situation in which Israel acts unilaterally. What we are actually
witnessing is a new phase of the catastrophe in Gaza. While the characteristics
of this phase are not yet known, Israel's violence has become ever
more evident. And perhaps this is why Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
did not mention the word "peace" once in the speech he gave
to announce the ceasefire. The "peace process" might soon
be revealed as the other side of the coin to war -- its continuation
by other means -- that simultaneously feeds it. Full Story>>
Bob
Woodward’s four books chronicling the wars of President
George W. Bush are sensitive barometers of conventional wisdom in Washington.
Whereas the first volume, published in 2002 at the height of the self-righteous
nationalism gripping the capital after the September 11, 2001 attacks,
hailed Bush’s self-confidence in acting to protect the homeland,
the 2008 installment depicts the same man as cocksure and incurious.
This much is not news. More educational are Woodward’s hints
about the worldviews that will outlast this unpopular administration,
embedded in the organs of the national security state. Full
Story>>
The
Egyptian regime has once again succeeded in stifling freedom of speech,
this time not in Egypt, but in the US. Earlier this month, an Egyptian
court convicted a prominent Egyptian-American activist for his outspoken
criticism of the regime’s poor human
rights record in American public fora. The court accused Saad Eddin
Ibrahim, of "tarnishing Egypt's image" abroad. The conviction
referred primarily to writings he published in the foreign press; most
notably among them an August 2007 op-ed in the Washington Post in which
he criticized Egypt's human rights record and questioned the reasons
behind US aid to Egypt. Full
Story>>
Militant
Islam is under global scrutiny for clues to conditions that foster
its rise, and to strategies for reversing that growth. But the key
is not in Islamic doctrine, US foreign policy or formal ties to various
nations, as many analysts have asserted. It lies at the community
level, with clan and local leaders. Full
Story>>
Kurdish
parties have become kingmakers in Baghdad , and they know it. As
no federal government can work without them, they are pulling every
available political lever to expand the territory and resources they
control, trying to build the foundation of an independent Kurdish state.
But even more than territory, they need security. If everyone acts
quickly and wisely, that understanding could help resolve one of the
Iraq war’s thorniest issues. Full
Story>>
The
debate over the war in Iraq follows a yellowing script: The minute
someone suggests that the US move to withdraw its troops, war supporters
cry “Havoc!”
True to form, when no less a figure than Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki stated he wants a timeline for a US pullout, John McCain
summoned the specter of dire consequences. “I’ve always
said we’ll come home with honor and with victory and not through
a set timetable,” McCain said. In his major foreign policy speech
on July 15, Barack Obama affirmed his support for a withdrawal timetable,
adding that the US must “get out as carefully as we were careless
getting in.” Obama’s position is the correct one, but he,
like many other war critics, has done too little to counter the refrain
that withdrawal is simply
“cutting and running,” a recipe for disaster. Full
Story>>